← TeamsSJRC-Haas
2019 Coed 18-39 · 3.5 Coed
3 players · average NTRP 3.67 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON
Scouting
Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
3.36
Stephanie Haasusually #1 Female Doubles 60%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 20% · published 3.5
—
Anna Koepkeusually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Results6 ties
2019-06-22Won 2–0
W#1 Female DoublesStephanie Haas / Nina Nguyen vs Aileen Valadez / Casey Billings6-3
W#1 Male DoublesNiel Amundson / Julian Miller vs Manuel Garcia-Fernandez / Huy Bui6-0
2019-06-15Split 1–1
W#1 Female DoublesStephanie Haas / Anna Koepke vs Katrina Phillips / Tiffany Hou6-2
L#1 Female SinglesStephanie Haas vs Brittany Pratt6-3
2019-06-09Lost 0–1
L#1 Male DoublesJulian Miller / Niel Amundson vs Manuel Garcia-Fernandez / Kyle McGovern6-5
2019-06-01Split 1–1
L#1 Female DoublesStephanie Haas / Anna Koepke vs Sophia Hoang / Brittany Pratt6-5
W#1 Male DoublesNiel Amundson / Julian Miller vs Austin Ngo / Austin Chanthakhoun6-1
2019-05-31Lost 0–3
L#1 Female DoublesKatie Chong / Anna Koepke vs Megan McCarter / Danielle Cuenco6-2
L#1 Male DoublesJulian Miller / Michael Schroeder vs Kevin Jarvis / Duy Nguyen6-2
L#1 Mixed DoublesStephanie Haas / Julian Miller vs Kevin Jarvis / Danielle Cuenco6-1
2019-05-11Won 1–0
W#1 Female DoublesStephanie Haas / Susha Pratt vs Tarynn Berkman / Megan McCarter6-4
A tie can be incomplete.
Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.
Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.