Teams

Team Stivani

2022 NMI Adult 40&O · 2022 NMI Adult 40&O 4.0W Stivani

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-01-22vs Team BlackmanLost 12
W#1 SinglesRachel Stivani vs Jennifer Buck6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Patten / Sandra Johnson vs Tina Blackman / Melanie LaFave6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMargaret Fedder / Shaun Schneider vs Judith McDonagh / Jana Phillips6-7, 2-6
2022-01-22vs Team BlackmanWon 21
W#1 DoublesMargaret Fedder / Rachel Stivani vs Tina Blackman / Sherry Guthrie6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Johnson / Nancy Schaefer vs Vanessa Ceniza / Melanie LaFave5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie Cooper / Shaun Schneider vs Jana Phillips / Jennifer Buck6-3, 6-3
2022-01-21vs Team BlackmanWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslie Cooper / Margaret Fedder vs Tina Blackman / Melanie LaFave6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Johnson / Nancy Schaefer vs Denise Urban / Jennifer Buck6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJennifer Patten / Rachel Stivani vs Jana Phillips / Judith McDonagh6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2022 NMI Adult 40&O 4.0W Stivani
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team Stivani309613130
2Team Blackman0331226178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Jennifer Patten
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Barbara Hodge
published 4
3.71
Margaret Fedder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Schaefer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Stivani
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Shaun Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Fedder + Rachel Stivani6454% games−3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Patten
18W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Barbara Hodge
11W–33L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
Margaret Fedder
36W–21L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Nancy Schaefer
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Stivani
25W–20L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shaun Schneider
4W–15L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.