Teams

Ghost Peppers

2023 WY Tri-Level · Cheyenne Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / WYOMING

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-07-09vs Try Tri AgainWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Justine Barone vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJudith Loomis / Carol Cuthbertson-Mayo vs Sheri Foster / Lorri Welsh6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDebra Olson / Ginger Paige vs Priscilla Gill / Brittany Wardle6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-09vs Try Tri AgainLost 12
W#1 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Justine Barone vs Ana Horvath / Allyson Horvath6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlyson Hagy / Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal vs Cheryl Johnson / Anne Moore4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebra Olson / Ginger Paige vs Priscilla Gill / Lorri Welsh1-6, 5-7
2023-06-26vs Try Tri AgainLost 12
W#1 DoublesJustine Barone / Kathy Anselmo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAlyson Hagy / Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal vs Sheri Foster / Brittany Wardle1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJudith Loomis / Carol Cuthbertson-Mayo vs Michelle Bush / Lorri Welsh1-6, 2-6
2023-06-21vs Try Tri AgainLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Anselmo / Justine Barone vs Ana Horvath / Allyson Horvath7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAlyson Hagy / Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal vs Cheryl Johnson / Anne Moore7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJudith Loomis / Carol Cuthbertson-Mayo vs Michelle Bush / Lorri Welsh3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cheyenne Women 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Kathy Anselmo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Justine Barone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Alyson Hagy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.17
Ginger Paige
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.59
Debra Olson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Carol Cuthbertson-Mayo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Judith Loomis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Olson + Ginger Paige1535% gamesnot enough data
Alyson Hagy + Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal2448% gamesnot enough data
Carol Cuthbertson-Mayo + Judith Loomis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Anselmo
40W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
4.13
4
Justine Barone
91W–55L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Alyson Hagy
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Ginger Paige
27W–57L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Debra Olson
15W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
2.59
Carol Cuthbertson-Mayo
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Janet Stanforth-Nachtigal
13W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Judith Loomis
3W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.