Teams

OC LPC - Lisa Nguyen - Sat9

2025 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend

19 players · average NTRP 4.27 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-20vs OC CMTC - Michelle -Sun9Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAngelica Ramos / Mina Whitlock vs Yumiko Tokiwa / Sayuri Maruna3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-08-31vs OC CMTC - Michelle -Sun9Won 10
W#2 DoublesSung Eun Kim / Angelica Ramos vs Yumiko Tokiwa / Sayuri Maruna6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMina Whitlock / Angelica Ramos vs Sabrina MacLachlan / Michele Savoie6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.85 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Dana Kim
published 4.5
Erin Kelley
published 4.5
4.24
Mina Whitlock
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.19
Eunice Han
published 4.5
4.18
Demi Dang
published 4.5
4.14
Chloe Kishel
published 4.5
4.14
Kim O'Neil
published
4.08
Vivian Ly
published
4.06
Margaret Chang
published
4.02
Hannah Middleton
published 4
3.98
Angelica Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.86
Sung Eun Kim
published
3.69
Gia Bao Le
published 4
3.68
Clarissa Htay
published 4
3.61
Serena Tseng
published 4
3.41
Veronika Zherdeva
published
3.13
LeAnne Ngo
published
2.69
Leslie Nguyen
published
Kim Ngo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Chang + Dana Kim2338% gamesnot enough data
Angelica Ramos + Mina Whitlock123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dana Kim
4W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.30
4.5
Erin Kelley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Mina Whitlock
121W–51L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Eunice Han
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
4.5
Demi Dang
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Chloe Kishel
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
4.14
Kim O'Neil
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
4.14
Vivian Ly
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Margaret Chang
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
4.06
4
Hannah Middleton
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
4.02
4
Angelica Ramos
103W–56L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
Sung Eun Kim
12W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Gia Bao Le
15W–15L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.69
4
Clarissa Htay
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Serena Tseng
54W–35L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Veronika Zherdeva
23W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
LeAnne Ngo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.13
Leslie Nguyen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.69
Kim Ngo
8W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.