Teams

Enriquez/Burt (F)

2025 Adult 18 & Over Fall · Men 3.0 (F)

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-20vs Harris/Strohmeyer (F)Split 22
L#1 DoublesGregory Enriquez / John Burt vs David Concors / JR Ross1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesShri Venkatesh Subramani vs Johnny Wang7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSamuel Spencer / Noah Basri vs Jim Strohmeyer / Jason Parmentier6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMason Jerman / DWAYNE WILLIAMS vs Hal Harris / Thomas Jostlein1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 (F) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Jacob Kirn
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.06
Sachin Agarwalla
published
2.90
Samuel Spencer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
DWAYNE WILLIAMS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Darshit Marwah
published 3
Farid Roman
published
Gregory Enriquez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
James Slaughter
published
Jay Unnikrishnan
published
John Burt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lucas Signorelli
published
Mason Jerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Noah Basri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shri Venkatesh Subramani
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Burt + Gregory Enriquez7847% games+3.8% vs expected
John Burt + DWAYNE WILLIAMS1632% games−12.7% vs expected
Gregory Enriquez + DWAYNE WILLIAMS044 matchesnot enough data
Noah Basri + DWAYNE WILLIAMS033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacob Kirn
23W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Sachin Agarwalla
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Samuel Spencer
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.90
3
DWAYNE WILLIAMS
2W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Darshit Marwah
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Farid Roman
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Gregory Enriquez
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
James Slaughter
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Unnikrishnan
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Burt
15W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lucas Signorelli
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mason Jerman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Noah Basri
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shri Venkatesh Subramani
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.