Teams

JTC - Woody

2023 Alachua Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-28vs DB - CrawfordSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTracey Bryant / Mary Cribb vs Jamie Primosch / Kelly Banes1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAli Messenger / Courtney Woody vs Heather Gibson / Susan Benton6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-25vs DB - CrawfordLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlison Andrus vs Anne Billion6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMary Cribb / Jennine Brandt vs Wheeler Crawford / Kelly Banes3-6, 2-6
2023-06-24vs DB - CrawfordLost 02
L#2 DoublesAmanda Fuller / Peggi Bockman vs Dorie Frum / Marla Ambrose4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTracey Bryant / Jennine Brandt vs Tammy Miller / Heather Gibson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-06-11vs DB - CrawfordLost 02
L#2 DoublesMary Cribb / Alison Andrus vs Kelly Banes / Rachel Rodriguez5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Woody / Jennine Brandt vs Caroline Hord / Lan Hoang-Minh2-6, 3-6
2023-06-03vs DB - CrawfordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCourtney Woody / Taiana Mendez vs Kelly Banes / Jamie Primosch7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMary Cribb vs Jordan Davis5-7, 3-6
2023-05-26vs DB - CrawfordLost 02
L#1 DoublesCourtney Woody / Mary Cribb vs Emily Dace / Caroline Hord4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTaiana Mendez vs Maria Curatolo2-6, 3-6
2023-05-07vs DB - CrawfordSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Cribb / Courtney Woody vs Kelly Banes / Wheeler Crawford6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesPeggi Bockman vs Darby Townsend0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Courtney Woody
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.85
Alison Andrus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
3.84
Tracey Bryant
published 4
Cynthia Thibault
published 4
3.54
Taiana Mendez
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Kim Magee
published
3.40
Stephanie Ryan
published
Ali Messenger
published 3.5
3.08
Jigisha Shah
published
Jennine Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Lindsey Wilson
published
Mary Cribb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Peggi Bockman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Valerie de Crecy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Andrus + Kim Magee1537% games−8.6% vs expected
Peggi Bockman + Alison Andrus4352% gamesnot enough data
Peggi Bockman + Taiana Mendez5064% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cribb + Courtney Woody2347% gamesnot enough data
Peggi Bockman + Jennine Brandt134 matchesnot enough data
Mary Cribb + Jennine Brandt044 matchesnot enough data
Taiana Mendez + Alison Andrus123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Woody
22W–16L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Alison Andrus
79W–67L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Tracey Bryant
48W–46L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Cynthia Thibault
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Taiana Mendez
23W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
Kim Magee
11W–13L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
Stephanie Ryan
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Ali Messenger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jigisha Shah
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.08
Jennine Brandt
77W–116L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lindsey Wilson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Cribb
34W–56L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peggi Bockman
30W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie de Crecy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.