Teams

Shukla, Lindsey

2024 Team Singles-JXN · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 2.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-22vs Barnes, DarrylLost 12
L#1 SinglesLindsey Shukla vs Ellie Boutot1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesDarrilyn Mitchell vs Robynne Shields4-6, 4-6
W#3 SinglesJordan Bryan vs BRITTANY MORALES6-3, 6-4
2024-12-15vs Barnard, OliviaLost 03
L#1 SinglesLindsey Shukla vs Amanda Carter1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesLyndsie North vs Tori Campbell5-7, 5-7
L#3 SinglesTracy Rhinewalt vs Corey Aiken1-6, 2-6
2024-12-14vs Wiygul, RachelWon 21
L#1 SinglesAriana Palacios vs Alexia Sykes1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLyndsie North vs Kayla Saranthus6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJordan Bryan vs Rachel Wiygul6-1, 6-0
2024-11-24vs Bamzai, VidhiWon 20
W#1 SinglesAriana Palacios vs Emilie Lynn6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLindsey Shukla vs Kym Gore6-3, 6-3
2024-11-19vs Taylor, AlyssaWon 21
W#1 SinglesAriana Palacios vs Gwynn Cunningham6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesTracy Rhinewalt vs Monique Holmes1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesLyndsie North vs Kamryn Lantz7-5, 6-2
2024-11-03vs Price, KimWon 30
W#1 SinglesAriana Palacios vs Sherry Bouldin6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLindsey Shukla vs Stephanie Jierski6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJordan Bryan vs Kim Price6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Barnard, Olivia601449110
2Shukla, Lindsey4210817138
3Wiygul, Rachel2481020153
4Price, Kim1571122152
5Bamzai, Vidhi0611735210

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Ariana Palacios
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.78
Jordan Bryan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.74
Lindsey Shukla
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.48
2.29
Darrilyn Mitchell
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.03
Tracy Rhinewalt
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Lyndsie North
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ariana Palacios + Lindsey Shukla303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ariana Palacios
35W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
2.90
Jordan Bryan
17W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.78
Lindsey Shukla
26W–18L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Andrea Hart-Crovetto
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
2.5
Darrilyn Mitchell
10W–16L career · 1 line in 2024
0%94%6%
2.29
Tracy Rhinewalt
14W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Lyndsie North
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.