Teams

Warriors/Krishnan/San Ramon

2025 Tri-Level 3.0 · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-05vs Put the ball away/Chang/SunnyvaleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSunny Singh / Ashish Bhardwaj vs Jaewan Mun / Vladan Popovic3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVishy Venkitakrishnan / Maximiliano Renna vs Andrew Liu / Derrick Contreras6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMoorthi Kothandaraman / Arjun Kumar vs Kevin Jiang / Matt Dunleavy6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 DoublesPRITESH SONU / Thangavel Duraisamy vs Peter Dollinger / Neil Gurnani1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesVishy Venkitakrishnan / Amrish Pantvaidya vs Octavio Farfan / Balamurugan Muthaiah6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJatin Khera / Arjun Kumar vs Xiaotong Sun / Richard Zhao3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
PRITESH SONU
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Vishy Venkitakrishnan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Ashish Bhardwaj
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Navneet Bhatia
published
3.48
Amod Ghangurde
published 3.5
3.47
Gurupreet Chabda
published 3.5
3.44
Amrish Pantvaidya
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Maximiliano Renna
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Arjun Kumar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.10
Moorthi Kothandaraman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Jatin Khera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Thangavel Duraisamy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vishy Venkitakrishnan + Amrish Pantvaidya2348% gamesnot enough data
Moorthi Kothandaraman + Jatin Khera224 matchesnot enough data
Navneet Bhatia + Ashish Bhardwaj303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

PRITESH SONU
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
Vishy Venkitakrishnan
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.62
4
Ashish Bhardwaj
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Navneet Bhatia
11W–9L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Amod Ghangurde
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Gurupreet Chabda
67W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Amrish Pantvaidya
17W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Maximiliano Renna
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%85%14%
3.36
3
Arjun Kumar
20W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.26
Moorthi Kothandaraman
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.10
Jatin Khera
26W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.97
Rajan Balasubramanian
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thangavel Duraisamy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.