Teams

Northern: 6.0 W 65 Raffa

2025 65&Over Women · 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-11vs Golden DivasWon 30
W#1 DoublesSherry Best / Catherine Herman vs Kathleen Kelly / Jane Metzger6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Dygert / Suzanne Hauber vs Joyce Tarantino / Roseanne Kryjak6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTheresa OBrien / Jo Anne Raffa vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-27vs Defying GravityWon 21
L#1 DoublesSherry Best / Catherine Herman vs Sheillagh Egan / Marianne Harris3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Moran / Paula Doherty vs Angela Urdanoff / Penny Hill7-6, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Dygert / Suzanne Hauber vs Gloria Hessell / Shari Whiting6-0, 6-0
2025-06-05vs Golden DivasWon 21
W#1 DoublesLinda Dygert / Suzanne Hauber vs Deborah Richards / Janet Marler6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCatherine Herman / Sherry Best vs Joyce Tarantino / Roseanne Kryjak6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Day Treece / Jo Anne Raffa vs Gail Adams / Jane Metzger5-7, 1-6
2025-05-28vs Defying GravityWon 21
L#1 DoublesRose Fennessey / Janine Rome vs Sheillagh Egan / Marianne Harris6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSherry Best / Catherine Herman vs Christine Timber / Verna Gerrity6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPaula Doherty / Kathleen Moran vs Lisa Brainard / Lynn Rogers7-6, 6-0
2025-05-15vs Golden DivasWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanine Rome / Karen D'Arcangelo vs Cindy Kelly / Kathy Johnson6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLinda Dygert / Rose Fennessey vs Barbara Hoffman / Roseanne Kryjak6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDeborah Day Treece / Theresa OBrien vs Kathleen Kelly / Susan Runkel6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-05-09vs Defying GravityLost 03
L#1 DoublesRose Fennessey / Karen D'Arcangelo vs Lisa Brainard / Mary Ann Cooper7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPaula Doherty / Theresa OBrien vs Sheillagh Egan / Marianne Harris2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSherry Best / Catherine Herman vs Christine Timber / Verna Gerrity6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Northern: 6.0 W 65 Raffa5111715126
2Defying Gravity4211717168
3Golden Divas0651327194

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Sherry Best
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Kathleen Moran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Karen D'Arcangelo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Linda Dygert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Jo Anne Raffa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Suzanne Hauber
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Theresa OBrien
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Janine Rome
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Paula Doherty
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Catherine Herman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Deborah Day Treece
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Rose Fennessey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa OBrien + Janine Rome13660% games+2.2% vs expected
Theresa OBrien + Rose Fennessey3549% games+1.8% vs expected
Linda Dygert + Suzanne Hauber14855% games−3.4% vs expected
Paula Doherty + Kathleen Moran7852% games−7.6% vs expected
Paula Doherty + Suzanne Hauber1632% games−13.7% vs expected
Sherry Best + Linda Dygert7552% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Best + Catherine Herman4358% gamesnot enough data
Janine Rome + Karen D'Arcangelo5151% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sherry Best
56W–82L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Kathleen Moran
102W–131L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
Karen D'Arcangelo
19W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.91
3
Linda Dygert
84W–87L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Jo Anne Raffa
53W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Suzanne Hauber
68W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Theresa OBrien
47W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Janine Rome
42W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Paula Doherty
50W–141L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Catherine Herman
22W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
2.5
Deborah Day Treece
5W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rose Fennessey
17W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.