Teams

HCC Yablonski

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Weekend Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-01Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Lesley Alouf vs Shari Schneider / Emily Weinstein6-3, 6-2
2024-05-07vs ACAC Naylor/HoeferLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Teki Hall vs Kathie Naylor / Sandra Holahan2-6, 5-5
L#2 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Stacey Haug vs Jordan Harper / Rose Yuen6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-20vs Burkwood ClarkLost 01
L#1 SinglesStephanie Yablonski vs Kasey Booth1-6, 3-6
2024-04-13vs Kanawha Weekend ShireyLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Yablonski / Lisa Frazier vs Lauren Turner / Krista Quinby7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Weekend Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Mary Beth Scott
published
3.46
Stephanie Yablonski
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.40
Brittany Nichols
published 3.5
3.33
Lisa Frazier
published
3.23
Teki Hall
published
3.14
Kimberly Ross
published
3.01
Kirsten Knull
published
2.98
Stacey Haug
published
2.95
Kirsten Mullaney
published
Krysten Bishop
published
Lesley Alouf
published
Susan Mangin
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Beth Scott
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Stephanie Yablonski
124W–85L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Brittany Nichols
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.40
Lisa Frazier
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Teki Hall
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Kimberly Ross
10W–5L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Kirsten Knull
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Stacey Haug
20W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Kirsten Mullaney
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
2.95
Krysten Bishop
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lesley Alouf
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Mangin
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.