Teams

LBible.7.5C-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 10 8:00 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Sep 17 8:00 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Sep 24 8:00 PM
Garrett Road Tennis Courts
Oct 1 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Oct 8 6:30 PM
Hope Valley Country Club
2026-08-20vs MDaubert-DFCWon 30
W#1 DoublesElaine Hudson / Keshia Green vs Christa McGill / Adriana Doi6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHannah Boghosian / Alison Sinclair vs Susie Post-Rust / Amy Johnston3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLiz Chen / Ragini Singh vs Jeanne Murray / Melissa Daubert3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 18 & Over Combo 7.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LKulp.7.5C-SVC103008
2KLaan-DUR1030118
3LBible.7.5C-DUR1030228
4CHaywood-DUR1021329
5SFranks.7.5C-DUR1021330
6MEasterling18C-HVCC1021332
7TPerrone-DUR1021433
8CBaddour.18C-CHCC0112428
9CAvery.7.5C-CHTC0112430
10JRoss.7.5C-DUR0112531
11KEvans-DUR0112535
12MDaubert-DFC0103633
13MLong.7.5C-DUR0103635
14GArtis-DUR0103636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Cary Armstrong
published 4
3.78
Molly Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.71
Hannah Boghosian
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Liz Chen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Aly Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Kristin Cooley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Elizabeth Harvie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.60
Elaine Hudson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Loralie Bible
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Alison Sinclair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Keshia Green
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Jamie Moy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Ragini Singh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kristie Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Cooley + Loralie Bible12261% games+5.3% vs expected
Elaine Hudson + Molly Andrews6257% games−4.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Harvie + Aly Miller314 matchesnot enough data
Keshia Green + Elaine Hudson314 matchesnot enough data
Kristin Cooley + Cary Armstrong303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cary Armstrong
97W–62L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.83
Molly Andrews
27W–23L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Hannah Boghosian
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Liz Chen
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Aly Miller
19W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Kristin Cooley
34W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.68
Elizabeth Harvie
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Elaine Hudson
33W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%25%75%
3.60
3.5
Loralie Bible
182W–64L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Alison Sinclair
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Keshia Green
27W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jamie Moy
18W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Ragini Singh
94W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Kristie Elliott
24W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.