Teams

Arfeen 55 6.5M Combo Thurs PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Men 55+ Thurs PM

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesMark Guanciale / Toni Rodriguez vs Eric McFarlin / Stephen Moore6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSyed Arfeen / Chris Just vs William Davis / Bill Watson4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesScott Jensen / Andy Strand vs Bruce Hipsher / Bruce Eaton2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesToni Rodriguez / Mark Guanciale vs James Beardsley / Jeff Shue6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesTanvir Chodri / Jeff Ryding vs Steve Guild / Kenton Kreager4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSami Kazi / Nadeem Akhtar vs Timothy Shantry / Danny Finnegan3-6, 2-6
2026-08-06vs Patnaik 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesToni Rodriguez / Mark Guanciale vs Robert Lanham / Juan Fernandez6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAndy Strand / John Dutton vs Dennis Stearns / MIKE ROBINSON3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesScott Jensen / Nadeem Akhtar vs William Johnson / Steve Elliott6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 6.5 Men 55+ Thurs PM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Schneiderman 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM3072565
2Eaton/Moore 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM1142439
3Arfeen 55 6.5M Combo Thurs PM1133750
4Pretzsch 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM1133858
5Patnaik 55s 6.5M Combo Thurs PM031816105

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Toni Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Sami Kazi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Tanvir Chodri
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Syed Arfeen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
John Dutton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Chris Just
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.97
Scott Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Nadeem Akhtar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Andy Strand
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.66
Mark Guanciale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Jeff Ryding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanvir Chodri + Toni Rodriguez7066% games+6.3% vs expected
Syed Arfeen + Tanvir Chodri3448% games−5.4% vs expected
Mark Guanciale + Toni Rodriguez213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Toni Rodriguez
39W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
Sami Kazi
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Tanvir Chodri
21W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Syed Arfeen
23W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
John Dutton
22W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Chris Just
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Scott Jensen
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
Nadeem Akhtar
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Andy Strand
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Guanciale
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Jeff Ryding
4W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.