Teams

CAC/SL-Bet-On-Our-Court

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-09vs FC-Good Shots-HornWon 21
L#1 DoublesTatyana Gordon / Vandella Stewart vs Cheryl Lydon / Natalia Kuznetsova1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAnnie Kuang vs Abby Miller7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Kandace Barnes vs Rachel Martin / Leslie Boyd6-1, 7-6
2024-03-03vs PSC-Racquettes-OnuWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Kandace Barnes vs Irina Salvan / Svetlana Petculescu5-7, 1-5
W#1 SinglesAnnie Kuang vs Li Qin7-5, 2-2
W#2 DoublesTatyana Gordon / Louise Radtke vs Geanina Andreiu / Camelia Clinciu6-3, 7-5
2024-02-23vs BC-Hot Shots-UnderwoodWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Lara Diaconu vs Lavina Poorswani / Asha DSouza3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAnnie Kuang vs Natalie Banks7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesVandella Stewart / Tatyana Gordon vs Amy McCullough / Brooke Small2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-02-16vs TCSP-DavisWon 30
W#1 DoublesLara Diaconu / Kandace Barnes vs Susan Bussell / Alysson Bashey6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAnnie Kuang vs Dara Lockert7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLouise Radtke / Vandella Stewart vs Erika Olson / Mary Casey4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-09vs TCSP-SpainLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Lara Diaconu vs Lisa Sowder / Janice Gupta7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTatyana Gordon vs Leona Zamora0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLouise Radtke / Andrea Wyman vs Jill Walzer / Lisa Williamson3-6, 2-6
2024-02-03vs PL-WalkerWon 30
W#1 DoublesVandella Stewart / Lara Diaconu vs Wendy Walker / Inger Karker6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAnnie Kuang vs Olena Boyarska6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Kandace Barnes vs Neha Sabharwal / Charan Saini6-0, 6-0
2024-01-20vs ETC-Box 2.5WWon 21
W#1 DoublesLara Diaconu / Kandace Barnes vs Carrie Toppano / Jennifer Grimes6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesTatyana Gordon vs Christina Ntouniaoglou6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarisa Betancourt / Andrea Barraclough vs Olga Moshchuk / Elnaz Ansari2-6, 3-6
2024-01-06vs BC-Hot Shots-UnderwoodWon 30
W#1 DoublesKandace Barnes / Carisa Betancourt vs Sibylle Brown / Asha DSouza6-7, 6-5
W#1 SinglesAnnie Kuang vs Dulce Bjorklund6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesVandella Stewart / Tatyana Gordon vs Brooke Small / Megan Elliott7-6, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CAC/SL-Bet-On-Our-Court7118616190
2NWW-BTA-Morgan7119516155
3NWW-TCSP-Campos6219514150
4BAIN-Slice Girls-Carrillo62141021179
5BC-Andrews6215922183
6FC-Good Shots-Horn62141024192
7CP-TNT-Choi44141024183
8PSC-Racquettes-Onu44121225209
9BC-Hot Shots-Underwood44111327203
10EDG-Howard2671734244
11TCSP-O'Connor2671734243
12TCSP-Davis2691535232
13ETC-Box 2.5W0861837245
14MC-W 2.5-Buchanan0842041267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Annie Kuang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.33
Mary Turino
published 2.5
2.30
Vandella Stewart
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.29
Kandace Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.23
Tatyana Gordon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.13
Carisa Betancourt
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 2.5
2.06
Louise Radtke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andrea Barraclough
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Andrea Wyman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lara Diaconu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carisa Betancourt + Kandace Barnes4547% games+1.5% vs expected
Lara Diaconu + Kandace Barnes4453% games+1.3% vs expected
Vandella Stewart + Tatyana Gordon4543% games−9.4% vs expected
Andrea Barraclough + Carisa Betancourt0524% gamesnot enough data
Louise Radtke + Vandella Stewart2347% gamesnot enough data
Annie Kuang + Mary Turino1442% gamesnot enough data
Lara Diaconu + Vandella Stewart314 matchesnot enough data
Tatyana Gordon + Kandace Barnes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annie Kuang
51W–43L career · 6 lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Mary Turino
33W–31L career · no lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33
Vandella Stewart
24W–39L career · 8 lines in 2024
0%92%8%
2.30
Kandace Barnes
14W–25L career · 8 lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.29
2.5
Tatyana Gordon
35W–68L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Carisa Betancourt
54W–111L career · 11 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Louise Radtke
21W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Andrea Barraclough
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Andrea Wyman
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lara Diaconu
15W–17L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.