Teams

EM RED

2024 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-05vs CACM PINKWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa Zink / Ashley Wolfe vs Sarah Kopp / Lynn Kitt6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJean Steimel vs Helene Grall-Johnson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesColley Moe / Ruth Rohs vs Amanda Sheehan / Camille Ford6-1, 6-0
2024-04-27vs LTFC GREENSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJean Steimel vs Janet Hill6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJll McLain / Melissa Zink vs Lisa Lash / Melody Sattizahn7-5, 6-3
2024-04-12vs SS-H REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichele Olree / Ashley Wolfe vs Vanessa Parsons / Kim Belitz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMelissa Zink vs Kathryn Ross6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJll McLain / Colley Moe vs Jane Braaten / Diana Nice6-2, 6-1
2024-03-30vs CACM REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesJll McLain / Michele Olree vs Bev Morrow / Carrie Steuart1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesColley Moe / Melissa Zink vs Kathy Bailey / Helen Wilson6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Melissa Zink
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.67
Jean Steimel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Jll McLain
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Colley Moe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Ashley Wolfe
published 3.5
3.12
Michele Olree
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colley Moe + Michele Olree121253% games+4.8% vs expected
Michele Olree + Jll McLain5457% games+3.1% vs expected
Jll McLain + Jean Steimel441161% games+2.6% vs expected
Melissa Zink + Colley Moe12562% games+1.7% vs expected
Melissa Zink + Michele Olree71152% games+0.8% vs expected
Michele Olree + Ashley Wolfe71045% games−3.3% vs expected
Melissa Zink + Jean Steimel7458% games−4.1% vs expected
Melissa Zink + Jll McLain314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melissa Zink
106W–81L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Jean Steimel
113W–80L career · 2 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Jll McLain
103W–63L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
3.5
Colley Moe
63W–75L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Ashley Wolfe
17W–23L career · type A · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Michele Olree
89W–142L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.