Teams

CZimmerman

2022 Cap Mixed 55 & over · 7.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-01vs WWeisLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Hackman / Mark Zimmerman vs Linda Carroll / John van Campen3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Zimmerman / Larry Essary vs Barbara Goff / Charles McAree6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesApril Lyon / Tim Lyon vs John Parham / Judy Hobson3-6
2022-07-25vs JKerznerWon 10
W#2 DoublesApril Lyon / Tim Lyon vs Christine Subasic / Shawn Subasic6-4, 6-2
2022-07-19vs PSteele/Brier Creek 7.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTodd Blevins / Susan Hackman vs Lori Jensen / Christof Jensen2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-07-12vs CConzola 55+ 7.0 MixedWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Zimmerman / Larry Essary vs Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall / David Swann6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesApril Lyon / Tim Lyon vs Tara LeFevre / Vincent Conzola6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-28vs JFOGLEMANWon 20
W#2 DoublesCarol Zimmerman / Larry Essary vs Cynthia White / Dane Huffman6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesApril Lyon / Randy Richardson vs Jean Williams / Peter Williams6-4, 6-3
2022-06-21Won 10
W#3 DoublesSusan Hackman / Todd Blevins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-14vs JNance55Won 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Hackman / Mark Zimmerman vs Chris Cody / Karen Cody6-2, 6-3
2022-06-07vs JTerrell 55+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesApril Lyon / Larry Essary vs Lori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Hackman / Todd Blevins vs Edward Poyo / Susana Harvey2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Larry Essary
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.27
Todd Blevins
published
3.16
Mark Zimmerman
published
3.04
Susan Hackman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.83
Lisa McDermott
published
2.68
Carol Zimmerman
published 3
2.65
April Lyon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Hackman + Larry Essary213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Larry Essary
110W–138L career · 4 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
Todd Blevins
12W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Mark Zimmerman
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Susan Hackman
90W–130L career · 5 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Lisa McDermott
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Carol Zimmerman
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
April Lyon
118W–140L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.