Teams

WC GREEN

2021 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.40 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-05vs CR BLACKLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristopher Watson / Steve Pulver vs Alex Mostrowski / Mark McCullough6-7, 5-7
2021-05-28vs GAC BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Watson / Eyal Tzarfati vs ARTHUR VAUGHN / Steven Kitchen6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSteve Pulver vs Eric Edwards6-4, 6-4
2021-05-24vs HV REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEyal Tzarfati / Christopher Watson vs Drew Conrad / John Doe7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSteve Pulver vs Beau Ellis6-1, 6-0
2021-05-17vs CACI REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesEyal Tzarfati / Christopher Watson vs Chris Nebinger / Edward Budd6-3, 7-5
2021-05-07vs HV REDSplit 11
W#2 SinglesEyal Tzarfati vs Beau Ellis6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSteve Pulver / Jeff Milanovich vs Jan Dorfman / TJ Neil4-6, 2-6
2021-05-03vs CPV GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Watson / Eyal Tzarfati vs Charles Skinner / Carsten Hannen6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDavid Friedman / Steve Pulver vs Aaron Batte / Jon Sutherland7-6, 7-6
2021-04-26vs CR BLACKLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Gagne / Eyal Tzarfati vs Alex Mostrowski / Mark McCullough3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Steve Pulver
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Christopher Watson
published 3.5
3.19
Eyal Tzarfati
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.10
Brad Lewis
published 3.5
2.94
David Friedman
published 3
2.77
Michael Gagne
published
2.42
Jeff Milanovich
published
Rick Katz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Pulver + Eyal Tzarfati5065% games+13.7% vs expected
Brad Lewis + Steve Pulver11066% games+13.3% vs expected
Christopher Watson + Eyal Tzarfati7170% games+10.3% vs expected
Michael Gagne + David Friedman5457% games+9.0% vs expected
Eyal Tzarfati + David Friedman4170% gamesnot enough data
Steve Pulver + Christopher Watson404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Steve Pulver
64W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Christopher Watson
25W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Eyal Tzarfati
58W–47L career · 6 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Brad Lewis
59W–31L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
David Friedman
15W–23L career · type S · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
2.94
Michael Gagne
28W–35L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Jeff Milanovich
7W–51L career · no lines in 2021
74%26%<1%
2.42
Rick Katz
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.