Teams

BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA 40AW4.0B

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
L#1 DoublesJoni Bartlett / Donna Blyshak vs Mara Dumond / Snjezana Maric6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLuz Diaz Arbelaez vs Terry Huang3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesJoni Bartlett / Heather La France vs Frances Caroline Gardhouse / Cori Mehring6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDonna Blyshak / Vivian Gabel vs Emi Iizuka / Lin Vong6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Michelle Nicholson
published
3.77
Mattie Wei
published
3.73
Robyn Vanderluit
published
3.72
Anh-Vi Dao
published 4
3.68
Shelly Shen
published
3.68
Vivian Gabel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Donna Blyshak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Heather La France
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Christina Tse
published 4
3.52
Yi Tian
published
3.45
Fang Wong
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Sonia Whitfield
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Christine Fronczak
published 3.5
3.24
Luz Diaz Arbelaez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Katrina Heiles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Blyshak + Vivian Gabel5455% games+0.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Nicholson
43W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.92
Mattie Wei
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Robyn Vanderluit
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Anh-Vi Dao
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
Shelly Shen
7W–15L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Vivian Gabel
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Donna Blyshak
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
4
Heather La France
10W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Christina Tse
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
Yi Tian
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Fang Wong
36W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Sonia Whitfield
19W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Christine Fronczak
50W–39L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Luz Diaz Arbelaez
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Katrina Heiles
20W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.