Teams

Bl.Leippe18T2.5

2024 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-07-30vs Ma.Cambo18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesCorinna Proctor / Kelsey Mueller vs Anh Vu / Andrea Zhou6-7, 4-6
2024-06-20vs Je.Komes18T2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesCorinna Proctor / Stacey Stephens vs Alison Sinclair / Jenny Komes7-6, 6-4
2024-06-13vs Li.Howard18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesCorinna Proctor / Allison Dugan vs Erika Martin / Amanda Falsone6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-05-30vs Ji.Orr18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Newson / Stacey Stephens vs Cassy Albertson / Ragini Singh6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Stacey Stephens
published
3.01
Corinna Proctor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Julie Newson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Sharon Poindexter
published
2.88
Heather Hofmann
published 3
2.84
AMY KOCH
published 3
2.56
Allison Dugan
published 3
2.23
Jane Bossert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Stephens + Corinna Proctor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Stephens
24W–23L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.33
3
Corinna Proctor
74W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Julie Newson
70W–78L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.98
Sharon Poindexter
1W–13L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Heather Hofmann
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
AMY KOCH
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Allison Dugan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
Jane Bossert
10W–18L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.