Teams

Zapp/Bella Vista/KTC

2025 Adult 55 & Over Spring League · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-22vs Carr/Bentonville/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDeborah Cooper / Julie Bothwell vs Debbie Carr / Stephanie Lightle6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEllen Nelson / Jennifer Beasley vs Teresa Oswald / Marilyn Hendrix4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSheila Lienhart / Wendy Zapp vs Carol Motta / Margie Story6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-04-16vs Wallman/Bella Vista/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Zapp / Jennifer Beasley vs Phyllis McCulley / Joellen Joy2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Cooper / Julie Bothwell vs Janice Bowen / Norma Hamm2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAudra Peterson / Sheila Lienhart vs Lisa Cloeter / Billie Joslin5-7, 2-6
2025-04-15vs Cook-Hanus/Rogers/PCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesEllen Nelson / Jennifer Beasley vs Joan Cook / Dondi Sanders7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTeri Malies / Eve LeMaster vs Marjorie Hanus / Jeanne Washburn1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJulie Bothwell / Audra Peterson vs Susan Chronister / Kimberly Larsen2-6, 4-6
2025-04-12vs Carr/Bentonville/KTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheila Lienhart / Deborah Cooper vs Marian Knaust / Margie Story3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDiana Laningham / Deborah Curtis vs Debbie Carr / Stephanie Lightle4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTeri Malies / Jennifer Beasley vs Teresa Oswald / Marilyn Hendrix2-6, 3-6
2025-04-09vs Wallman/Bella Vista/KTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesSheila Lienhart / Wendy Zapp vs Joellen Joy / Lisa Cloeter7-5, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Curtis / Diana Laningham vs Norma Hamm / Gina Beckstead3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEve LeMaster / Teri Malies vs Linda Wallman / Maggie Johnston5-7, 6-2
2025-03-23vs Cook-Hanus/Rogers/PCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesEllen Nelson / Eve LeMaster vs Susan Chronister / Diane Young7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDeborah Cooper / Wendy Zapp vs Kimberly Larsen / Jeanne Washburn6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Bothwell / Audra Peterson vs Marjorie Hanus / Susan Hutchinson6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Deborah Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Julie Bothwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.75
Sheila Lienhart
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Deborah Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Ellen Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Diana Laningham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Wendy Zapp
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.56
Eve LeMaster
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Teri Malies
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.23
Audra Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
kimberly cadle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Curtis + Diana Laningham1540% gamesnot enough data
Sheila Lienhart + Wendy Zapp134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Deborah Curtis
13W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Julie Bothwell
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Sheila Lienhart
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Deborah Cooper
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ellen Nelson
3W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Diana Laningham
6W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
2.61
Wendy Zapp
6W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
Eve LeMaster
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Teri Malies
2W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
2.5
Audra Peterson
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
kimberly cadle
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.