Teams

SGrindle (Weddington)

2024 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.35 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-01vs LHuntington (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Kapur / Stacey Herndon vs Pam Bright / Julie Moore6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJeri Zangmeister / Nancy Klug vs Brooke Leonnig / Marilyn Spencer7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSandra Torres / Jacqui Gentile vs Laura Case / Catherine Crigler3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-30vs NHashe (FCC)Won 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Staley / Sally Blocksom vs Courtney Slavin / Caroline Lattanzi3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBobbie McManus / Stacey Herndon vs Renu Renu Gill / Sue Ann Lang6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesScarlet Grindle / Jeri Zangmeister vs Sheri Noot / Julie Moran6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2024-09-10vs KAllen (Raintree)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Barrett / Sherry Teat vs Alyson Sunden / Suzanne Austin6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Klug / Stacey Herndon vs Staci Wittek / Jill Smith6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGabriela ROY / Cyndie Hobson vs Erin Moser / Katrina Richards3-6, 4-6
2024-09-03vs KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Kapur / Sherry Teat vs Katie Cronin / Sheila Passenant6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSusan Staley / AMY SAFIR vs Cindy Rhoten / Stacey Whitney6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJacqui Gentile / Nancy Klug vs Kim Sheehey / Sarah Garner7-6, 6-1
2024-08-27vs MMetzl (Sardis)Won 21
L#1 DoublesSally Blocksom / AMY SAFIR vs Kathryn Martin / Katherine Jay6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesStacey Herndon / Amy Barrett vs Anne Wilson / Martha Metzl3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGabriela ROY / Cyndie Hobson vs Kiera Young / Margaret Eshleman6-2, 6-4
2024-08-20vs KLee/SChandra (CTNC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Kapur / Sherry Teat vs Jeannine Mortenson / Lisa Langley6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGabriela ROY / Cyndie Hobson vs Shruti Chandra / Vicki Greenway6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandra Torres / Jacqui Gentile vs Laura Seth / Lauren Olson6-3, 6-3
2024-08-14vs THyso/KMoss (Life Time)Split 11
W#2 DoublesSandra Torres / Sally Blocksom vs Amy Ballaban / Alison Oxendine6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Staley / Bobbie McManus vs Leidys Pinzon / Julie Dailly3-6, 6-7
2024-08-13vs CMiles (Queens)Won 30
W#1 DoublesNancy Klug / Sherry Teat vs Karen Morgan / Kate MacRone6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBobbie McManus / Susan Staley vs Brenda Jandebeur / Julie Key6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesScarlet Grindle / Jeri Zangmeister vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Kristin Kapur
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
AMY SAFIR
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Cyndie Hobson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Nancy Klug
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.15
Gabriela ROY
published
3.11
Sherry Teat
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Stacey Herndon
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Susan Staley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Sally Blocksom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Bobbie McManus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.79
Scarlet Grindle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Jacqui Gentile
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Klug + Cyndie Hobson8261% games+12.6% vs expected
Nancy Klug + AMY SAFIR211455% games+2.7% vs expected
Susan Staley + Stacey Herndon9652% games−8.6% vs expected
Sally Blocksom + Susan Staley14955% games−10.8% vs expected
Sally Blocksom + AMY SAFIR5161% gamesnot enough data
AMY SAFIR + Stacey Herndon5156% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Klug + Sherry Teat3257% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Klug + Stacey Herndon4158% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristin Kapur
122W–57L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
3.5
AMY SAFIR
190W–92L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Cyndie Hobson
219W–123L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Nancy Klug
147W–103L career · 8 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Gabriela ROY
24W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%14%86%
3.15
3.5
Sherry Teat
115W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Stacey Herndon
103W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Susan Staley
107W–68L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
2.89
3
Sally Blocksom
129W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
3.5
Bobbie McManus
34W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
Scarlet Grindle
103W–60L career · 2 lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.79
3
Jacqui Gentile
95W–98L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.