Teams

Jestings/Patrizio/Nashville

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - Tuesday AM & PM

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-16vs Stevenson/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristie Harrison / Carolyn Slandzicki vs Stephanie Knight / Sue Anne Perry6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBeth Patrizio / Joni Jestings vs Samantha Sellers / Jennifer Spoletini6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLindsay Bentley / Ivy Dodson vs Rachel Stevenson / Lindsey Jarvis6-3, 6-0
2025-09-02vs Fisher/McNabb/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Wells / Jill Byrum vs Jennifer Thomas / Mary Katherine Seibels3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristie Harrison / Lindsay Bentley vs Stephanie Webb / Breigh Chadwick6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Slandzicki / Jennifer Comegna vs Julie Dearman / Holly Fisher1-6, 3-6
2025-08-26vs Vogel/Wood/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Powers / Nicole Keenan vs Stephanie Gillmor / Libba Alden2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChristie Harrison / Lindsay Bentley vs Sarah Vogel / Marcy Burridge6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTawnee Bennett / Stacey Wade vs Morgan Hinkley / Blaire Jett1-6, 4-6
2025-08-19vs Patterson/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristie Harrison / Carolyn Slandzicki vs Samantha Santilli / Sara White6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNicole Keenan / Annie Pons vs Rebecca Patterson / Lluvia Contaldo4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Farley / Ivy Dodson vs Rebecca Smeltzer / Debora Edkin5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-08-05vs Stevenson/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Byrum / Kathy Wells vs Cathy-Jo Elwood / Stephanie Knight6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBeth Patrizio / Wendy Farley vs Amy Brothers / Jennifer Spoletini6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDina Sjursen / Judith Gallagher vs Rachel Stevenson / Lindsey Jarvis2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-29vs Vogel/Wood/NashvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Powers / Lindsay Bentley vs Morgan Hinkley / Blaire Jett7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicole Keenan / Tawnee Bennett vs Lacey Keally / Lauren Hocker7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJudith Gallagher / Stacey Wade vs Stacey Wood / Marcy Burridge0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - Tuesday AM & PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Christie Harrison
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.44
Lindsay Bentley
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
Nicole Keenan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Kathy Wells
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Beth Patrizio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Sarah MacIntyre
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Jill Byrum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Mary Powers
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Wendy Farley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Stacey Wade
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Ivy Dodson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Carolyn Slandzicki
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Dina Sjursen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Joni Jestings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Tawnee Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.64
Jennifer Comegna
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Annie Pons
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Wade + Nicole Keenan5058% games+8.8% vs expected
Sarah MacIntyre + Jill Byrum2352% games−6.9% vs expected
Dina Sjursen + Jennifer Comegna3642% games−8.7% vs expected
Tawnee Bennett + Nicole Keenan134 matchesnot enough data
Dina Sjursen + Jill Byrum224 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Comegna + Jill Byrum134 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Wells + Jill Byrum224 matchesnot enough data
Ivy Dodson + Jill Byrum044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christie Harrison
33W–13L career · 7 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Lindsay Bentley
21W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Nicole Keenan
19W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Kathy Wells
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Beth Patrizio
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Sarah MacIntyre
8W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.17
Jill Byrum
14W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Mary Powers
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.09
Wendy Farley
14W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Stacey Wade
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Ivy Dodson
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
3
Carolyn Slandzicki
9W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Dina Sjursen
13W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
Joni Jestings
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.79
Tawnee Bennett
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.73
Jennifer Comegna
13W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Annie Pons
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.