Teams

WNCJ Hudgens (HRC)

Combo 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40's Women 7.5 Combo - Wed

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-10-01vs WNCA Elliot (ARC South)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJessica Pierce / Linda Nash vs Andi Elliot / Tina Kinard6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Zehr / Angela Hare vs Sherrie Voyles / Theresa Hash2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Hudgens / Laurie Guinn vs Susan Cook / Amy Gaston1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40's Women 7.5 Combo - Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Beth MacDonald
published 4
3.65
Leanne Groban
published
3.54
Jennifer Hudgens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Amelia Duernberger
published 3.5
3.43
Heidi Zehr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Linda Nash
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
TLynn Gilpin
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Laurie Guinn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Angela Hare
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Kenna Armstrong
published
3.11
Brenda Bowie
published 3.5
2.89
Sheri Sparks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Nash + TLynn Gilpin9071% games+12.7% vs expected
Jennifer Hudgens + TLynn Gilpin2456% games+10.8% vs expected
Jennifer Hudgens + Brenda Bowie3251% games+7.8% vs expected
Heidi Zehr + Beth MacDonald2341% gamesnot enough data
Kenna Armstrong + Heidi Zehr224 matchesnot enough data
Linda Nash + Leanne Groban123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Hudgens + Beth MacDonald213 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Guinn + Angela Hare213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth MacDonald
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Leanne Groban
13W–16L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Jennifer Hudgens
23W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.54
3.5
Amelia Duernberger
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
Heidi Zehr
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
Linda Nash
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
TLynn Gilpin
286W–221L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Laurie Guinn
7W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Angela Hare
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Kenna Armstrong
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Brenda Bowie
9W–22L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sheri Sparks
13W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.