Teams

LA LLW MountainGate Gators - Ray Sahranavard

2025 USTA Adult 55 & Over – LA · LA - Men 8.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-09vs LA - Fine as WineWon 10
W#2 DoublesBruce Hofert / Jamie Murphy vs Timothy Bryant / E Cosby6-1, 6-3
2025-08-02vs LA - Fine as WineWon 10
W#2 DoublesBruce Hofert / Michele Greco vs Thomas Childress / DeMille Halliburton6-0, 6-1
2025-07-26vs LA - Fine as WineWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Greco / Bruce Hofert vs Thomas Childress / Norman Jones6-2, 6-1
2025-07-19vs LA - Fine as WineWon 10
W#2 DoublesBruce Hofert / Ray Sahranavard vs Norman Jones / John Cox6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-07-13vs LA - Fine as WineLost 01
L#2 DoublesRandolph Magnin / Bruce Hofert vs DeMille Halliburton / Norman Jones7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Ray Sahranavard
published
3.68
Bruce Hofert
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.48
Glenn Kopelson
published
3.36
Steven Marenberg
published
3.28
Douglas Frank
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jamie Murphy
published
Michele Greco
published
Randolph Magnin
published
Roy Longman
published
Rupen Cetinyan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randolph Magnin + Ray Sahranavard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ray Sahranavard
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Bruce Hofert
58W–53L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Glenn Kopelson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
Steven Marenberg
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Douglas Frank
14W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Jamie Murphy
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michele Greco
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Randolph Magnin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Roy Longman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rupen Cetinyan
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.