Teams

Biesecker

2021 Frederick County Adult 55 & Over · Adult 55 & Over Women 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-26vs Debbie @ PamWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Jagodits / Julia Johnson vs Aline Rodriguez / Pamela Gowen6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2021-08-23vs Chicks with SticksWon 10
W#3 DoublesLorene Cannella / Karen Seyler vs Marcy Barrett / Joanne Stine6-3, 7-6
2021-08-19vs Debbie @ PamSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrenda Crowe / Anne Jagodits vs Deborah Lile / Nikki Irwin6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Almeida / Karen Seyler vs Pamela Gowen / Aline Rodriguez3-6, 3-6
2021-08-12vs Chicks with SticksWon 10
W#1 DoublesSharon Edelstein / Anne Jagodits vs Zola Allen / Maria Reyes-Soto6-1, 6-1
2021-08-09vs Debbie @ PamWon 10
W#3 DoublesAngie Martin / Karen Seyler vs Linda Jensen / Pamela Gowen6-4, 6-2
2021-07-21vs Debbie @ PamSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLynn Daggett / Karen Seyler vs Kimberley Gessner / Lori Hesen6-7, 3-4
W#2 DoublesJulia Johnson / Anne Jagodits vs Dreda Kelley / Annette Schiavone6-1, 6-2
2021-07-07vs Chicks with SticksWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Jagodits / Brenda Crowe vs Joanne Stine / Sophia Modi6-2, 6-3
2021-06-30Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Seyler / Lorene Cannella vs Linda Jensen / Elizabeth Norton5-7, 3-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over Women 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Anne Jagodits
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.82
Joy Oliver
published
Eileen Smith
published 4
3.71
Lisa Roy
published
3.67
3.53
Margaret Vermillion
published
3.49
Stephanie Almeida
published
3.37
Karen Seyler
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Lynn Daggett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Brenda Crowe
published 3.5
2.83
Jeanne Dolan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Seyler + Cecelia Biesecker9449% gamesnot enough data
Anne Jagodits + Karen Seyler4177% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Daggett + Karen Seyler224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Anne Jagodits
208W–213L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
Joy Oliver
15W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Eileen Smith
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Roy
34W–13L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Cecelia Biesecker
130W–122L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
Margaret Vermillion
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
3.53
Stephanie Almeida
3W–14L career · no lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Karen Seyler
134W–121L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Lynn Daggett
46W–64L career · 1 line in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Brenda Crowe
5W–6L career · no lines in 2021
19%81%<1%
3.11
Jeanne Dolan
1W–10L career · no lines in 2021
90%10%<1%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.