Teams

KY/LEX/Fox 18 Fall 24 Doubles

2024 USTA FALL LEAGUE 18 & Over · 2.5 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-20vs KY/LEX/CunhaLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Ahler / Sean Fox vs Igor Cunha / Matt Klein2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPearce Nisbet vs Dylan Merrill4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIvan Rice / Zach Mcclary vs Mauricio Escalante / Cesar Tovar3-6, 3-6
2024-11-07vs KY/LEX/CunhaLost 12
L#1 DoublesSean Fox / Mike Bensing vs Matt Klein / Josh Lingreen2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPearce Nisbet vs Mauricio Escalante6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesZach Mcclary / Steven Ahler vs Stephen Sanford / Josh Grueter0-6, 0-6
2024-10-24vs KY/LEX/CunhaWon 21
W#1 DoublesIvan Rice / Sean Fox vs Matt Klein / Cesar Tovar6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMike Bensing vs Igor Cunha1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaher Sarieh / Steven Ahler vs Stephen Sanford / Mauricio Escalante0-6, 4-6
2024-10-18vs KY/LEX/CunhaLost 02
L#1 DoublesSteven Ahler / Mike Bensing vs Andre Green / Dylan Merrill6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesZach Mcclary vs Cesar Tovar0-6, 0-6
2024-10-05vs KY/LEX/CunhaLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaher Sarieh / Ivan Rice vs Josh Lingreen / Andre Green1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Ahler / Zach Mcclary vs Josh Grueter / Cesar Tovar1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2.5 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LEX/Cunha419614104
2KY/LEX/Fox 18 Fall 24 Doubles1441124157

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.46 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Mike Bensing
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Ivan Rice
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.19
Maher Sarieh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Jason Tate
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Pearce Nisbet
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Steven Ahler
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Zach Mcclary
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Ahler + Maher Sarieh3448% games+0.8% vs expected
Ivan Rice + Steven Ahler134 matchesnot enough data
Steven Ahler + Mike Bensing044 matchesnot enough data
Maher Sarieh + Mike Bensing134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Bensing
27W–36L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Ivan Rice
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maher Sarieh
7W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.19
Jason Tate
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pearce Nisbet
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steven Ahler
6W–43L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zach Mcclary
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.