Teams

Smashin' Shots - Jamison

2026 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 6 9:00 AM
vs Donna JamisonMelissa Brunner-Brown
Hermitage Country Club
Sep 12 11:00 AM
vs Donna JamisonMelissa Brunner-Brown
Salisbury Country Club
2026-08-30vs Westwood Zach 6.5 ComboLost 12
W#1 DoublesBecky McNeer / Jaime Wisegarver vs Jamie McLeod / Jenny Sharrar6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMelissa Brunner-Brown / Betsy Gibson vs Sarah Thomas / Julia Baker6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Jamison / Cathy Keith vs Rose Yuen / Abbey Wallace4-6, 0-6
2026-08-23vs RMC - Sweeney/MuncyLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Hill / Mandy Tornabene vs Kandy Baserap / Cynthia Muncy5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Brunner-Brown / Betsy Gibson vs Jessica Golden / Kimberly Garrett6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Jaime Wisegarver vs Karen Albon / Eliza Causey6-7, 5-7
2026-08-15vs Ridgetop - ScammellLost 03
L#1 DoublesKarin Speizer / Betsy Gibson vs Martha Prideaux / Alice McCollum2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMandy Tornabene / Jaime Wisegarver vs Kimberly Pierce / Pearson French3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Elizabeth Matish vs Kristen Roper / Pamela Hutzler6-7, 1-6
2026-08-09vs MAC GaultWon 30
W#1 DoublesBecky McNeer / Sally Hurt vs Timea Harisova / Kristen Powers6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Haskin / Donna Jamison vs Kayci McLeod / CONSTANCE MATTOX6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCathy Keith / Caroline Andrews vs Maria Gault / Sarah Bennett5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-08-02vs ACAC No Strings Attached - JonesLost 03
L#1 DoublesBecky McNeer / Sally Hurt vs Tracey Watson / Ashley Curtis6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKarin Speizer / Cathy Keith vs Ariana Dickens / Martinique Kandl1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Brunner-Brown / Jaime Wisegarver vs Kelley Kent / Jodi Tandett3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · Richmond Combo Weekend 6.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ACAC No Strings Attached - Jones2051440
2RMC - Sweeney/Muncy2163777
3RT Winning Combo - Cheek21451189
4SCC Strings of Glory - Weisiger1030113
5Woodlake Cabral Combo 6.51142442
6Smashin' Shots - Jamison1133752
7ACAC Krebs/Bivins1124862
8KRA Anderson12451176
9TCRC-Hall12361491
10MTC - 6.5 Combo Hannon - Chenevert02151167
11Belmont Beauties Bates02061267
12Westwood Zach 6.5 Combo03361396

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Becky McNeer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.38
Karin Speizer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Mandy Tornabene
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.22
Jaime Wisegarver
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Donna Jamison
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.11
Caroline Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Melissa Brunner-Brown
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.05
Annmarie Strachan
published 3.5
3.02
Andrea Hill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.92
Betsy Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Laura Haskin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Sally Hurt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Cathy Keith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Elizabeth Matish
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becky McNeer + Donna Jamison5161% games+12.5% vs expected
Melissa Brunner-Brown + Annmarie Strachan0537% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Brunner-Brown + Donna Jamison134 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Brunner-Brown + Betsy Gibson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Becky McNeer
29W–19L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Karin Speizer
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Mandy Tornabene
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.35
Jaime Wisegarver
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Donna Jamison
19W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Caroline Andrews
69W–66L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
Melissa Brunner-Brown
11W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Annmarie Strachan
8W–12L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
3.05
3
Andrea Hill
18W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Betsy Gibson
17W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Laura Haskin
6W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.91
Sally Hurt
13W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Cathy Keith
7W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Elizabeth Matish
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.