Teams

RCC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-20vs CVTA NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesJenny Pergola / Lisa Yedo vs Lakshmi Vegesna / Sarah Downey5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesAnne Cadden vs Shaun Howe1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJacquelynn Johnson / Tonya Johnson vs Liz Downey / Elizabeth Corujo5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKaren Coyle / Diane Misgen vs Rashmi Anki / Alicia Miller1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-13vs MEA GOLDLost 13
W#1 DoublesLisa Yedo / Jacquelynn Johnson vs Kim Zoller / Vera Moreno-Hamm5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJenny Pergola vs Sally Hatcher2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Misgen / Kirsten Coppo vs Miriam McCarty / Julie Scott4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPatricia Sato / Karen Coyle vs Jacquie Prescott / Ann Roth3-6, 4-6
2021-07-06vs CVTA BLUELost 13
L#1 DoublesTonya Johnson / Karen Coyle vs Amanda Kapolnek / Alisa Mallinger0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLisa Yedo vs Jo Ann Johnson7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDiane Misgen / Jacquelynn Johnson vs Lori Moehn / Tara Sisneros4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnne Cadden / Kirsten Coppo vs Kristen Davidson / Katherine Dierking4-6, 4-6
2021-06-29vs BTA REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKirsten Coppo / Jenny Pergola vs Emily Koechel / Annika Paradise6-2, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAnne Cadden vs Christy Valentine1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Yedo / Karen Coyle vs Christina Davies / Keryn Schneider6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatricia Sato / Jacquelynn Johnson vs Eva Raschke / Gia Medeiros1-6, 1-6
2021-06-22vs LTA GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJenny Pergola / Lisa Yedo vs Tammy Duerksen / Rhonda Dudley6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTonya Johnson vs Cami Kidwell-Dodge7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatricia Sato / Jacquelynn Johnson vs Aimee Merkel / Lindsay Roland7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Coyle / Tierney Luoma vs MK Mehsling / Rebecca Upthegrove6-0, 6-0
2021-06-15vs CVTA NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTonya Johnson / Kirsten Coppo vs Liz Downey / Steffani Hafner4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJenny Pergola vs Lakshmi Vegesna6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJacquelynn Johnson / Karen Coyle vs Sarah Downey / Rashmi Anki6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTierney Luoma / Anne Cadden vs Michelle Gleason / Alicia Miller7-6, 6-3
2021-06-08vs MEA GOLDLost 13
W#1 DoublesJenny Pergola / Tonya Johnson vs Sally Hatcher / Kim Zoller7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnne Cadden vs Wendy Morone7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Sato / Lisa Yedo vs Samantha MacMillan / Jacquie Prescott5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJacquelynn Johnson / Tierney Luoma vs Ann Roth / Julie Scott4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Tonya Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.07
Diane Misgen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jacquelynn Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.67
Kirsten Coppo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Anne Cadden
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Jenny Pergola
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lisa Yedo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Sato
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Tierney Luoma
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Wendy Atkinson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Sato + Diane Misgen6354% games+5.3% vs expected
Kirsten Coppo + Jenny Pergola6452% games+3.6% vs expected
Diane Misgen + Tonya Johnson3450% games+2.0% vs expected
Jacquelynn Johnson + Diane Misgen8456% games+0.3% vs expected
Lisa Yedo + Jacquelynn Johnson2448% games−0.9% vs expected
Tierney Luoma + Diane Misgen3246% games−1.4% vs expected
Lisa Yedo + Patricia Sato2544% games−8.6% vs expected
Patricia Sato + Jacquelynn Johnson1538% games−14.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tonya Johnson
82W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Diane Misgen
83W–75L career · 3 lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Jacquelynn Johnson
25W–38L career · type A · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Kirsten Coppo
48W–61L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
2.5
Anne Cadden
36W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
0%74%26%
2.42
Jenny Pergola
30W–30L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Yedo
18W–18L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Patricia Sato
32W–32L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tierney Luoma
33W–24L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Atkinson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.