Teams

CCV Angel

2023 Richmond Tri-Level 18 & Over Weeknight · Richmond Tri-Level 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-25vs MAC WilliamsLost 02
L#2 DoublesMindy Angel / Hunter Harrell vs Erin Waters / Carol Gregory3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Williamson / Teresa Whitworth vs Delaney Rhodus / Katherine McDowell3-6, 4-6
2023-10-18vs MAC WilliamsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAndrea Rahal / Elizabeth Wallace vs Courtney Greiner / Suzanne Spiller6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTeresa Whitworth / Susan Trigg vs Heather Barefoot / Debbie Messmer1-6, 4-6
2023-10-11vs MAC WilliamsSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEsther Fratkin / Elizabeth Wallace vs Carol Gregory / Courtney Greiner6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTeresa Whitworth / Susan Trigg vs Delaney Rhodus / Katherine McDowell2-6, 0-6
2023-10-04vs MAC WilliamsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMindy Angel / Katherine Mueller vs Carol Gregory / Suzanne Spiller2-6, 0-6
2023-09-19vs MAC WilliamsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMindy Angel / Esther Fratkin vs Courtney Greiner / Suzanne Spiller2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKatherine Mueller / Andrea Rahal vs Erin Waters / Carol Gregory1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Tri-Level 5.0, 4.5, 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.71
ANN HALL
published 5
4.25
Elizabeth Krusen
published 4.5
4.15
Esther Fratkin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Katherine Mueller
published
3.94
Mindy Angel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.90
Andrea Rahal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Courtney Harper
published 4
Teresa Whitworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Karen Williamson
published
3.64
Alison Avery
published 4
Mary C Nesbitt
published
Susan Trigg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Rahal + Mindy Angel2642% gamesnot enough data
Teresa Whitworth + Mindy Angel1536% gamesnot enough data
Courtney Harper + Karen Williamson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
ANN HALL
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
4.71
4.5
Elizabeth Krusen
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Esther Fratkin
35W–32L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%<1%
4.15
Katherine Mueller
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Mindy Angel
54W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
68%32%<1%
3.94
4.5
Andrea Rahal
55W–38L career · 2 lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
3.90
4
Courtney Harper
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Teresa Whitworth
26W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Williamson
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Alison Avery
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
3.64
Mary C Nesbitt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Trigg
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.