Teams

HCC-Halstead/Sheridan

2023 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.38 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-12vs Hills/K. Armagost/Combo50&Over8.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMarie Teixeira / Jennifer Lewis vs Leticia Leppert / Lisa Freeman2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJillene Davis / Michele Vogeley vs Dianne Albina / Janet Karpan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-10-15vs Hills/K. Armagost/Combo50&Over8.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Vogeley / Judi Alford vs Dianne Albina / Lara Slatniske6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy van Winter / Stephanie Wager vs Lara Cavanaugh / Anne-Lucie Bouchard6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-10-08vs Davis Island - J. SalmonWon 10
W#2 DoublesNancy van Winter / Stephanie Wager vs Lisa Oonk / Stephanie Geshel6-2, 6-0
2023-09-24vs Hills/K. Armagost/Combo50&Over8.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLinda Thomson / Judi Alford vs Janet Karpan / Lara Cavanaugh6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMarie Teixeira / Jenny Hughes vs Lisa Freeman / Karen Abrams1-6, 2-6
2023-09-17vs Davis Island - J. SalmonWon 10
W#1 DoublesJudi Alford / Melissa Sheridan vs Alejandra Sanderson / Julia van Diver6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Stephanie Wager
published 4.5
4.31
Judi Alford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Deborah Nicklaus
published 4.5
4.09
Uyen Tran
published
3.96
Patty Halstead
published
3.75
Michele Vogeley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Marie Teixeira
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.74
Jenny Hughes
published
3.73
Melissa Sheridan
published
3.72
Deena Walter
published 4
3.54
Nancy van Winter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Jillene Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Vogeley + Deena Walter6059% games+5.9% vs expected
Melissa Sheridan + Patty Halstead8263% games+4.9% vs expected
Jenny Hughes + Melissa Sheridan7160% games+4.1% vs expected
Jenny Hughes + Nancy van Winter123 matchesnot enough data
Deena Walter + Patty Halstead123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Stephanie Wager
55W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
Judi Alford
89W–31L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Deborah Nicklaus
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Uyen Tran
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
Patty Halstead
16W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.96
Michele Vogeley
69W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Marie Teixeira
19W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Jenny Hughes
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
Melissa Sheridan
27W–8L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Deena Walter
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Nancy van Winter
69W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
Jillene Davis
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.