Teams

Served and Confused

Spring Adult 18 & Over Lone Star (Non-Adv) · Lonestar Ladies 2.5

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-22vs Slice GirlsLost 12
W#1 DoublesBethany Pendleton / Rachelle Campbell vs Alison Ducker / Laurin Hornsby8-4
L#2 DoublesAlison Pendleton / Tracy Slappey-scott vs Shannon Peris / Emily Hayes4-8
L#3 DoublesLaura Merino / Celes Ybarra vs Becky Best / Mai Ferrara6-8
2026-03-22vs Deuce QueensLost 03
L#1 DoublesTracy Slappey-scott / Laura Merino vs Inbal Kleinerman / Sezer Isuf3-8
L#2 DoublesBethany Pendleton / Alison Pendleton vs Martha Coerver / Carrie Kilpatrick2-8
L#3 DoublesCeles Ybarra / Rachelle Campbell vs Maria Pantaleoni / Eileen Steinberger5-8
2026-03-21vs Westoverhead SmashersLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlison Pendleton / Bethany Pendleton vs Belinda Gallagher / Alison Means2-8
L#2 DoublesRachelle Campbell / Laura Merino vs Marianne Stout / January Pfiester3-8
L#3 DoublesCeles Ybarra / Alexandra Hickey vs Narjis Rachad / Lizaveta Matsiushonak2-8
2026-03-21vs NorthWestie BestiesLost 12
L#1 DoublesBethany Pendleton / Rachelle Campbell vs Rachael Shimek / Julie Frost5-8
W#2 DoublesLaura Merino / Tracy Slappey-scott vs Theresa Tarantino / Casey Fisher8-6
L#3 DoublesAlison Pendleton / Alexandra Hickey vs Michele Scott / Emma Ross0-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Lonestar Ladies 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.91 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.18
Tracy Slappey-scott
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.12
Rachelle Campbell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.99
Laura Merino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
1.96
Celes Ybarra
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.93
Alison Pendleton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.76
Bethany Pendleton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.45
Alexandra Hickey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Daniel Rodriguez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Hickey + Bethany Pendleton0523% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tracy Slappey-scott
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Rachelle Campbell
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Laura Merino
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
2.5
Celes Ybarra
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
2.5
Alison Pendleton
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
2.5
Bethany Pendleton
1W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.76
2.5
Alexandra Hickey
0W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.45
Daniel Rodriguez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.