Teams

Kulas - Serve Aces

2024 Virginia Beach Combo · Virginia Beach Combo 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-06vs CaskillLost 01
L#3 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Stephanie Bowen vs Sandra Savino / Stephanie Caskill5-7, 3-6
2024-11-22vs CamdenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Kristyn Hedley vs Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz / Shannon Dupre4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBeth Kulas / Amy Lehmkuhler vs Cara Anthony / Andrea Keller1-6, 4-6
2024-11-08vs CaskillWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Stephanie Bowen vs Grayson Kellam / Ashley Holmes6-3, 6-3
2024-11-01vs CamdenWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Bonnie Green vs Katie LeGrande / Shannon Dupre6-2, 7-6
2024-10-18vs CaskillWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlyse Chickey / Kristyn Hedley vs Ashley Jessee / Gail Moyer6-4, 6-1
2024-10-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Stephanie Bowen vs Jessica Hoffman-Schmitz / Erin James0-6, 4-6
2024-09-27vs CaskillLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristyn Hedley / Alyse Chickey vs Melissa Johnson / Courtney Kellam3-6, 3-6
2024-09-20vs CamdenLost 01
L#1 DoublesBeth Kulas / Megan Bradshaw vs Megan Farr / Kimberly Cummings4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Virginia Beach Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Alyse Chickey
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.47
Elizabeth Peterson
published 3.5
3.31
Kristyn Hedley
published
3.29
Beth Kulas
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.13
Jenna DeLigio
published
2.77
Stephanie Bowen
published
Amy Lehmkuhler
published 3
2.65
Bonnie Green
published 3
2.54
Megan Bradshaw
published
Jennifer Kamarek
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alyse Chickey + Elizabeth Peterson7654% games+3.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alyse Chickey
98W–58L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Elizabeth Peterson
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Kristyn Hedley
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Beth Kulas
78W–73L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Jenna DeLigio
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.13
Stephanie Bowen
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Amy Lehmkuhler
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Bonnie Green
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
2.65
Megan Bradshaw
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jennifer Kamarek
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.