Teams

Estey 9.0 Summer

2024 MIXED 18 & OVER SUMMER · 9.0 MX (FRI)

13 players · average NTRP 4.42 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrittany Alexander / Sam Hobbs vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-07vs Pavek 2024 summerLost 01
L#3 DoublesMarti Estey / Sam Hobbs vs Rachel LaTour / Cameron Sloan4-6, 1-6
2024-05-31vs Tretsven/Menne 9.0 summerLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrittany Alexander / Sam Hobbs vs Jacqueline Bettenga / Samuel Cychosz4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 MX (FRI) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.89
Chase Johnson
published 5
4.67
Tommy Entwistle
published
4.27
Isabella Lambert
published
Ankit Gupta
published 4.5
Candace Hanes
published 4.5
4.05
Brittany Alexander
published 4.5
4.05
Marti Estey
published
3.90
Sam Hobbs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Genevieve Swanson
published
3.72
Andrea Boado
published 4
3.70
Stephanie Crowl
published
Kyle Hoffmann
published
Mit Chareundy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Boado + Chase Johnson6162% games+4.9% vs expected
Kyle Hoffmann + Stephanie Crowl5255% gamesnot enough data
Genevieve Swanson + Chase Johnson5166% gamesnot enough data
Isabella Lambert + Sam Hobbs224 matchesnot enough data
Kyle Hoffmann + Genevieve Swanson224 matchesnot enough data
Genevieve Swanson + Sam Hobbs404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chase Johnson
28W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.89
Tommy Entwistle
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.67
Isabella Lambert
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.27
4.5
Ankit Gupta
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Candace Hanes
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Brittany Alexander
24W–28L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
Marti Estey
18W–29L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.05
4
Sam Hobbs
249W–170L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.90
Genevieve Swanson
59W–65L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Andrea Boado
60W–43L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.72
Stephanie Crowl
34W–47L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Kyle Hoffmann
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mit Chareundy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.