Teams

LCTA18/Lorel/Doty Park

2022 USTA 18 & Over Spring · 18 & over Women 3.0 - Night

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18 & over Women 3.0 - Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Ann Edwards
published 3.5
Beth Armstrong
published 3.5
2.98
Vera Markovic
published
2.80
Laurie Fletcher
published
2.74
Natalie Buttars
published
2.69
Monika Erhardt
published
2.64
Jennifer Waggoner
published
1.99
Pauline Collier
published
Karen Hughes
published
Lorel Morris
published
Nancy Quattlebaum
published
Tonya Spivey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Armstrong + Ann Edwards10177% games+33.6% vs expected
Lorel Morris + Ann Edwards7365% games+15.0% vs expected
Karen Hughes + Ann Edwards4350% games+7.2% vs expected
Vera Markovic + Karen Hughes5259% games+2.8% vs expected
Laurie Fletcher + Karen Hughes4250% games−1.1% vs expected
Monika Erhardt + Vera Markovic3355% games−11.0% vs expected
Beth Armstrong + Karen Hughes5074% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Fletcher + Jennifer Waggoner314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Edwards
121W–45L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Beth Armstrong
80W–18L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Vera Markovic
65W–33L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
2.98
Laurie Fletcher
52W–34L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Natalie Buttars
17W–23L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Monika Erhardt
21W–23L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
2.69
Jennifer Waggoner
45W–37L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
Pauline Collier
5W–21L career · no lines in 2022
>99%<1%<1%
1.99
Karen Hughes
56W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lorel Morris
40W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Quattlebaum
25W–22L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tonya Spivey
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.