Teams

TOC.Hagopian-Edwards

2024 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-14vs TOC.KimLost 01
L#3 SinglesSharon Fadelici vs Yuna Kim4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-30vs CAS.LowranceLost 02
L#1 SinglesSharon Fadelici vs Karen Johnston0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJudith Hagopian-Edwards vs Tracy Lowrance2-6, 0-6
2024-07-24Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJudith Hagopian-Edwards vs Lindsey Grinnell6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-17vs TOC.IrishLost 01
L#1 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Nicole Dolan5-7, 5-7
2024-06-26vs TOC.LeahyLost 01
L#3 SinglesJudith Hagopian-Edwards vs Sarah Rodriguez1-6, 2-6
2024-06-19vs TOC.MurphySplit 11
W#1 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Glynda Westerbeek6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJudith Hagopian-Edwards vs Julie Pedraza2-6, 1-6
2024-06-12vs TOC.MurphyWon 21
W#1 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Melissa Raasch6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesSharon Fadelici vs Julie Wray6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJudith Hagopian-Edwards vs Wendy Younkin6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-29vs TOC.IrishWon 10
W#2 SinglesTracy Grasser vs Helen Cooper6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Sharon Fadelici
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.87
Tracy Grasser
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.83
Audrey Hollett
published 3
2.82
Mary T Long
published
2.76
Lisa Brandman
published
2.59
Matalaba Napier
published
2.30
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Grasser + Sharon Fadelici9855% games+3.7% vs expected
Audrey Hollett + Sharon Fadelici8650% games−1.5% vs expected
Judith Hagopian-Edwards + Tracy Grasser3247% gamesnot enough data
Matalaba Napier + Judith Hagopian-Edwards123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sharon Fadelici
184W–140L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Tracy Grasser
146W–131L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Audrey Hollett
34W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
2.83
Mary T Long
48W–104L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
2.82
Lisa Brandman
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
2.76
Matalaba Napier
13W–25L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%94%6%
2.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.