Teams

LLAS UPTA55C/Kim/ACAC

55 & Over Combo · 8.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-25vs CTL55/Newman/CTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrian Okraska / Frank Powell vs Brian Glassman / Michael Hall3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoo Ho Kim / Tom Arnold vs John May / Robert French6-2, 6-1
2025-10-25vs HHTL55/Lane/Port RoyalLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Okraska / Steven Szabo vs Daniel Lieberman / Chris Hall1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Bartlett / Grant Hunter vs Glenn Sheaffer / Albert Day6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKevin Hall / Steve Miller vs Todd Stone / Steve Simone1-6, 5-7
2025-10-24vs GSTL55/Droseiko/StablesWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrian Bartlett / Grant Hunter vs Michael Mitchell / Robert Cobb7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKevin Hall / Steve Miller vs Paul Hendrix / Matt Angell5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Okraska / Steven Szabo vs Chris Leonard / Robert Horvath6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-24vs CTL55/Eaker/WRCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Okraska / Steve Miller vs Christopher Eaker / Mike Phillips6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrian Bartlett / Grant Hunter vs Shawn Burke / Tim Tracy6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoo Ho Kim / Tom Arnold vs David Moore / Reginald Cooper6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Brian Okraska
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Brian Bartlett
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Kevin Hall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.07
Frank Powell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Grant Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Joo Ho Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tom Arnold
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kevin Hall + Brian Okraska4164% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Hall + Frank Powell033 matchesnot enough data
Brian Bartlett + Grant Hunter303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Okraska
13W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Brian Bartlett
13W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.17
Kevin Hall
10W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
Frank Powell
56W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%30%70%
4.07
4
Grant Hunter
29W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Joo Ho Kim
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tom Arnold
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.