Teams

Atlanta AC (Elizabeth Klespies)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Lori Brown)

16 players · average NTRP 3.90 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Lori Brown) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Elizabeth Klespies
published 4.5
4.13
Kristy Denbow
published
3.82
Diana Volino
published 4
3.82
Nicole Hansotia
published
Emily DePalma
published 4
3.71
Lee Callahan
published
3.71
Kimberly Salamone
published
3.59
Meg Heusel
published
3.59
Julianne Ryan
published
3.59
Kris Cowart
published
3.29
Stacy Montagner
published
Caroline Matheny
published 3.5
Elizabeth Hunter
published 3.5
Sandy Johnson
published
Shari Wilkison
published
Victoria Whipple
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Hansotia + Lee Callahan201054% games+2.3% vs expected
Nicole Hansotia + Diana Volino314 matchesnot enough data
Kristy Denbow + Kris Cowart033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Klespies
23W–25L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Kristy Denbow
17W–20L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Diana Volino
52W–36L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
Nicole Hansotia
47W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Emily DePalma
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lee Callahan
43W–25L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
Kimberly Salamone
8W–29L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.71
Meg Heusel
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.59
Julianne Ryan
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Kris Cowart
15W–48L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.59
Stacy Montagner
41W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.29
3.5
Caroline Matheny
9W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Elizabeth Hunter
10W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandy Johnson
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shari Wilkison
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Victoria Whipple
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.