Teams

Southhampton Lockhart

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.64 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-06-08Lost 01
L#2 SinglesFaith Kallman vs Corrine Cooper3-6, 3-6
2022-05-24Won 10
W#2 SinglesFaith Kallman vs Christina Bier7-6, 7-6
2022-05-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesFaith Kallman vs Deirdre Vaughan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Aimee Vaughn
published 4
3.81
Lindsay Hardage
published 4
3.41
Robin Griffith
published
3.38
Eileen Cerny
published 3.5
3.30
Deena Kretzer
published 3.5
3.26
Judy Napier
published
3.22
Alice McCollum
published 3.5
3.21
Linda Larue
published
3.20
Rhysa South
published
3.17
Beth Stafford
published 3.5
3.16
Susan Lockhart
published
3.16
Linda Wood
published
3.06
Faith Kallman
usually #1 Singles 70%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 3.5
3.03
Maureen Sisti
published
Monte Shorte
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhysa South + Susan Lockhart4254% gamesnot enough data
Judy Napier + Linda Larue123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Lockhart + Alice McCollum303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Aimee Vaughn
45W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
4.03
4
Lindsay Hardage
94W–63L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Robin Griffith
31W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Eileen Cerny
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Deena Kretzer
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Judy Napier
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Alice McCollum
23W–22L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.22
Linda Larue
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
Rhysa South
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Beth Stafford
17W–11L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Susan Lockhart
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Linda Wood
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Faith Kallman
205W–166L career · 10 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.06
Maureen Sisti
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.03
Monte Shorte
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.