Teams

JJZhu/ATan (Park Road)

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 2.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.15 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-31vs SWhitney (Queens)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Burcham / Chivonne Hunter vs Stacey Whitney / Teneika Funderburk2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDana Adams / Antoinette Tan vs Kristina Cancian / Elizabeth Myers6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesGabrielle Parks / JJ Zhu vs Allison Geoghegan / Alexis Whitney3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-07-24vs JHarling (Park Crossing)Split 11
L#2 DoublesAshlee Pickering / Antoinette Tan vs Abby Gipe / Carla Sweeney2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJJ Zhu / Katie Fuller vs Delana Kessler / Brianna Hynes6-3, 6-3
2025-07-20vs ABroemel (Queens)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAshlee Pickering / Megan Jessee vs Emily Pansa / Kimberly Wyborski5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-17vs KAllen (Raintree)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChivonne Hunter / Sarah Cunningham vs Megan Hua Shaul / Lesley Quick0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAntoinette Tan / Ashlee Pickering vs Stacy Andrews / Jill Smith2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesHailey Foreman / Gabrielle Parks vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-01vs ETurkus (Springfield)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAntoinette Tan / Megan Jessee vs Julie Swanson / Sarah Nitsche4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErin Dailey / Gabrielle Parks vs Jen Abernathy / Kayla Meyer1-6, 5-7
2025-06-26vs SWhitney (Queens)Split 11
L#2 DoublesAshlee Pickering / Antoinette Tan vs Jackie Gyoerkoe / Karen Moss4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErin Dailey / Gabrielle Parks vs Natalia Kosyanenko / Allison Geoghegan6-2, 6-2
2025-06-19vs JHarling (Park Crossing)Won 30
W#1 DoublesChivonne Hunter / Ashlee Pickering vs Kim Giusti / Diane Hancock6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLauren Culp / Megan Jessee vs Abby Gipe / Carla Sweeney2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJJ Zhu / Katie Fuller vs Delana Kessler / Christine Weiss6-1, 6-2
2025-06-18vs KAllen (Raintree)Split 11
L#1 DoublesChivonne Hunter / Ashlee Pickering vs Katrina Richards / Nicole Love7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErin Dailey / Gabrielle Parks vs Erica Testerman / Marcy Williams7-6, 6-0
2025-06-07vs ETurkus (Springfield)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesDana Adams / Ashlee Pickering vs Julie Swanson / Sarah Nitsche6-1, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJJ Zhu / Hailey Foreman vs Kayla Meyer / Heather Hagar1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-05vs ABroemel (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChivonne Hunter / Sarah Cunningham vs Allison Broemel / Marietta Wickham2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Jessee / Ashlee Pickering vs Sara Ash / Marissa Connolly3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesHailey Foreman / JJ Zhu vs Emily Pansa / Kimberly Wyborski4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Beth Burcham
published 3.5
3.45
Chivonne Hunter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Alexis Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Annabel Chen
published 3.5
2.99
Dana Adams
published 3
2.82
Ashlee Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.67
Lauren Culp
published
2.64
Megan Jessee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Hailey Foreman
published
2.42
Antoinette Tan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.40
JJ Zhu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.10
Gabrielle Parks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Erin Dailey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Antoinette Tan + Ashlee Pickering5949% games+6.8% vs expected
Megan Jessee + Ashlee Pickering13953% games+1.2% vs expected
Antoinette Tan + Megan Jessee51245% games−1.6% vs expected
Ashlee Pickering + Dana Adams4166% gamesnot enough data
Beth Burcham + Dana Adams314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Burcham
27W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Chivonne Hunter
34W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Alexis Cochran
57W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Annabel Chen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3
Dana Adams
21W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Ashlee Pickering
47W–48L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Lauren Culp
1W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
3
Megan Jessee
45W–50L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Hailey Foreman
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Antoinette Tan
69W–117L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
3
JJ Zhu
28W–67L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40
2.5
Gabrielle Parks
12W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Erin Dailey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.