Teams

Baymeadows - Phillips

2026 Duval Adult 65 & Over - Women · 7.0 Women--Winter League

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-23vs Duval/SageLost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Ann Rice / Susan Millar-Nicol vs Laurie Sage / Teri Sackmaster6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarson Lee Phillips / Nancy Racine vs Tonya Kern-Honea / Martha Poitevent6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesShelley Thompson / Patricia Livesay vs Kelly Frauenfelder / Patty Trabue4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-22vs Williams Y - CathcartWon 30
W#1 DoublesRobin Braddock / Susan Millar-Nicol vs Dora Barren / Kandee Townsend6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarson Lee Phillips / Nancy Racine vs Lisa Rangeo / Jennifer Williams6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJUDITH DEVRIES / Mary Ann Rice vs KATHY COLLINS / Minnie Smith6-1, 6-2
2026-03-09vs Williams Y - CathcartLost 12
L#1 DoublesCherie Johnson / JUDITH DEVRIES vs Lisa Rangeo / Karen White0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Livesay / Shelley Thompson vs Dora Barren / Lynn Bledsoe6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Millar-Nicol / Mary Ann Rice vs Jennifer Williams / Lynn Herbert6-3, 6-1
2026-03-02vs Duval/SageLost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Livesay / Shelley Thompson vs Laurie Sage / Kelly Frauenfelder6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDonna Kamke / Susan Millar-Nicol vs Theresa Lawrence / Teri Sackmaster2-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNancy Racine / JUDITH DEVRIES vs Martha Poitevent / Tonya Kern-Honea0-6, 4-6
2026-02-23vs Williams Y - CathcartWon 21
W#1 DoublesJUDITH DEVRIES / Nancy Racine vs Minnie Smith / KATHY COLLINS6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDonna Kamke / Susan Millar-Nicol vs Kandee Townsend / Dora Barren6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCarson Lee Phillips / Denise Lee vs Lisa Rangeo / Nancy Wentz2-6, 3-6
2026-02-16vs Williams Y - CathcartWon 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Millar-Nicol / JUDITH DEVRIES vs Virginia Collins / Minnie Smith6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelli Bushman / Robin Braddock vs Kandee Townsend / Dora Barren2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPatricia Livesay / Shelley Thompson vs Jennifer Williams / Melissa Ebener7-6, 6-3
2026-02-09vs Duval/SageWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Millar-Nicol / Denise Lee vs Teri Sackmaster / Theresa Lawrence7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPatricia Livesay / Shelley Thompson vs Martha Poitevent / Kelly Frauenfelder6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Racine / JUDITH DEVRIES vs Patricia Brandler / Barbara Neville6-3, 6-2
2026-01-19vs Duval/SageWon 21
W#1 DoublesShelley Thompson / Patricia Livesay vs Theresa Lawrence / Martha Poitevent7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJUDITH DEVRIES / Donna Kamke vs Carolynn Koenig / Patty Trabue6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMary Ann Rice / Kelli Bushman vs Tonya Kern-Honea / Laurie Sage2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women--Winter League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Donna Kamke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Kelli Bushman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
JUDITH DEVRIES
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.19
Carson Lee Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Cherie Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Mary Ann Rice
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Racine
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Patricia Livesay
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Robin Braddock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Shelley Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Millar-Nicol
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Livesay + Shelley Thompson7356% gamesnot enough data
Donna Kamke + Susan Millar-Nicol7171% gamesnot enough data
JUDITH DEVRIES + Cherie Johnson4159% gamesnot enough data
JUDITH DEVRIES + Nancy Racine213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Kamke
28W–8L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Kelli Bushman
23W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
JUDITH DEVRIES
10W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Carson Lee Phillips
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.19
3.5
Cherie Johnson
8W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12
Mary Ann Rice
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Racine
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Patricia Livesay
7W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robin Braddock
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shelley Thompson
8W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Susan Millar-Nicol
12W–2L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.