Teams

MThompson (Windyrush)

2026 Singles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-20vs EOBrien (WSRC)Won 20
W#2 SinglesBurns McGarry vs Vladislav Valtsis6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTommy Cary vs Alberto Botero4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-07-06vs CRabidou (Carmel)Won 21
L#1 SinglesBurns McGarry vs Steven DiVittorio3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesIan Klass vs Andrew Halverstam7-6, 6-2
W#3 SinglesVictor Ellison vs Christopher Rabidou6-3, 7-6
2026-06-29vs DBarden (Mountainbrook)Won 30
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Nakayama vs Patrick Blandford6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesIan Klass vs Robert Barden6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesVictor Ellison vs Daniel Malecki6-3, 6-2
2026-06-22vs MFiddes (Raintree)Won 21
W#1 SinglesBurns McGarry vs Josh Wolff5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesSarat Mishra vs John Causey6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesTommy Cary vs Michael Fresina3-6, 5-7
2026-06-15vs HMahgoub/DMichael (PCC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesDarden Blow vs Mark Richards6-4, 7-5
W#2 SinglesIan Klass vs Philip Heidkamp6-1, 6-0
2026-06-14vs LEvansek (Blakeney)Won 30
W#1 SinglesBurns McGarry vs Ganesh Pallem6-1, 7-6
W#2 SinglesDarden Blow vs Rishi Gogate6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesVictor Ellison vs Michel Abranches6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2026-06-08vs KFranks (PPRSC)Won 20
W#1 SinglesSarat Mishra vs Rod Wilkes6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesDarden Blow vs Douglas Powell3-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Singles 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Jeffrey Nakayama
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.63
Ian Klass
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.61
Victor Ellison
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.59
Darden Blow
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Sarat Mishra
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.42
Burns McGarry
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Tommy Cary
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darden Blow + Ian Klass15760% games+4.5% vs expected
Victor Ellison + Ian Klass4162% gamesnot enough data
Ian Klass + Tommy Cary213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Nakayama
13W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.71
3.5
Ian Klass
79W–48L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Victor Ellison
82W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Darden Blow
42W–30L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Sarat Mishra
48W–62L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Burns McGarry
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Tommy Cary
26W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.