Teams

OC GNBS

2025 Team Singles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-22Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLianne Poppinga vs Julie Chang1-6, 2-6
2025-11-15vs Serve & Slay 3.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAni Dinkova vs Lovely Lacbay0-6, 2-6
2025-11-02Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAni Dinkova vs Julie Chang0-6, 0-6
2025-10-26vs Serve & Slay 3.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLianne Poppinga vs Amber Genke0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lefty ?? Love5151234
2Serve & Slay 3.04242436
3OC GNBS06061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
2.90
Rumiko Wong
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.71
Lianne Poppinga
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.51
Ani Dinkova
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ani Dinkova + Novajocymarie Nishida314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Novajocymarie Nishida
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Rumiko Wong
65W–74L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Lianne Poppinga
20W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Ani Dinkova
14W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.