Teams

KGibson (Raintree)

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 3.0 - Thurs PM

13 players · average NTRP 2.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-10vs AAltamura/LDragon (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCharlie Humphries / Lauren Humphries vs Nicholas Ferraro / Briana Ferraro1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrett Testerman / Krista Gibson vs Ashley Dillon / Taylor Dillon1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesChris Rowe / Rachel Staton vs Dominic Ferraro / Virginia Wooten0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesLauren Humphries / Chris Gibson vs Sarah Anderson / Darrin Theriault3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCrystal Rowe / Chris Rowe vs Shabari Kandasami / Sarah Varner0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Leigh Marquez / Arnoldo Marquez vs Kristi Lee / Brandon Bissinnar0-6, 3-6
2025-06-08vs TZimmer (PPRSC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCami Teel / Scott Teel vs Craig Menninger / Joan Carney0-6, 0-6
2025-06-05vs KDavis/ABroemel (Queens)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCami Teel / Scott Teel vs Stephanie Qunbar / Lincoln Eppard1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 3.0 - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charlie Humphries
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Krista Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Lauren Humphries
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.41
Chris Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.38
Arnoldo Marquez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Anna Leigh Marquez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Scott Teel
published
2.14
Brett Testerman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.04
Cami Teel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.98
Erica Testerman
published
1.97
Chris Rowe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.90
Crystal Rowe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Rachel Staton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Krista Gibson + Chris Gibson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Charlie Humphries
0W–1L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Krista Gibson
27W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%8%92%
2.69
Lauren Humphries
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%25%75%
2.60
3
Chris Gibson
1W–12L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.41
3
Arnoldo Marquez
0W–11L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
2.5
Anna Leigh Marquez
9W–18L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
Scott Teel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.28
2.5
Brett Testerman
0W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
2.5
Cami Teel
6W–16L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Erica Testerman
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
2.5
Chris Rowe
0W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.97
2.5
Crystal Rowe
3W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Rachel Staton
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.