Teams

Baby Got Backhand

2021 18&Over Women · 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-07-19vs Get a GripWon 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Decarolis / Cecile Morris vs Natalie Fischer / Sue Kelkenberg7-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVirginia Filiaci / Susan Robbins vs Patt Faygan / Ruthanne Wannop6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill Kirby / Kim Athans vs Diana Cavall / Tracey Mangano6-3, 6-1
2021-07-12vs Chicks with SticksLost 12
L#1 DoublesVirginia Filiaci / Jane Fuller vs Margaret Popek / Aimee Leberer1-6, 6-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTina Schultz vs Jennifer Gurske-DePerio1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPenny Cipolla / Susan Robbins vs Marcy Lofaso / Jill Morrish6-3, 6-4
2021-06-28vs Buff: Slice GirlsLost 04
L#1 DoublesVirginia Filiaci / Cecile Morris vs Kathleen Lucey / Jennifer Boscia Smith5-7, 3-3
L#1 SinglesTina Schultz vs Emay Sun3-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Kacala / Jill Kirby vs Julie Lunghino / Kathy Benzinger1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Nappo / Sylvia Spelman vs Gail Raimond / Amy Hulse1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-14vs String CourtetsWon 41
W#1 DoublesJane Fuller / Cecile Morris vs Kelley Vanslander / Sandra Harrigan-Banas6-2, 4-5
W#1 SinglesTina Schultz vs Allison Underwood4-6, 4-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Robbins / Penny Cipolla vs Michele Bergevin / Michele Digregorio6-3, 4-5
L#2 SinglesAnne Hoehn vs Roxanne Williams1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Nappo / Wendy Glauber vs Kayti Lausch / Patricia McGrath7-5, 6-2
2021-06-07vs Park: JosephWon 31
W#1 DoublesDonna Decarolis / Cecile Morris vs Julie Alford / Robin Wolfgang1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTina Schultz vs Caroline Smith6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSusan Robbins / Penny Cipolla vs Anna Gwozdz / Elizabeth Schultz7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKim Athans / Sheila Eberhard vs Beth Gosch / Marlene Dashkoff0-6, 3-6
2021-05-24vs HRC: JosephWon 50
W#1 DoublesSusan Robbins / Jill Kirby vs Toni Roessler / Carolyn Ciminelli7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesRachel Silva vs Jeannine Higgins6-2, 6-5
W#2 DoublesVirginia Filiaci / Penny Cipolla vs Marsha Huard / Lilian Mclellan6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTina Schultz vs Michelle Gwozdz6-3, 5-5
W#3 DoublesLinda Nappo / Wendy Glauber vs Sally Briggs / M J Orazi6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Cecile Morris
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.91
Virginia Filiaci
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Penny Cipolla
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Anne Hoehn
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.69
Rachel Silva
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.66
Donna Decarolis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Jane Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Susan Robbins
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.50
Jennifer Kacala
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Kim Athans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jill Kirby
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Nappo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tina Schultz
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Fuller + Kim Athans5262% games+12.5% vs expected
Virginia Filiaci + Susan Robbins5357% games+9.6% vs expected
Virginia Filiaci + Jane Fuller7654% games+2.9% vs expected
Penny Cipolla + Virginia Filiaci9753% games+0.8% vs expected
Penny Cipolla + Susan Robbins9752% games+0.3% vs expected
Cecile Morris + Donna Decarolis12751% games−4.6% vs expected
Penny Cipolla + Donna Decarolis1545% games−8.3% vs expected
Jennifer Kacala + Kim Athans2539% games−9.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cecile Morris
55W–63L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Virginia Filiaci
68W–70L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
Penny Cipolla
39W–31L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Anne Hoehn
11W–22L career · type S · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Rachel Silva
31W–24L career · 1 line in 2021
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Donna Decarolis
63W–61L career · 5 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Jane Fuller
66W–82L career · 8 lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
2.63
Susan Robbins
25W–20L career · 5 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jennifer Kacala
12W–48L career · 1 line in 2021
50%50%<1%
2.50
Kim Athans
24W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
66%34%<1%
2.45
Jill Kirby
9W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Nappo
24W–38L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tina Schultz
12W–17L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.