Teams

Weber, Tim

2022 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 4.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.42 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-12-04vs HOA/Mekles/18&Over4.5MWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Merchant / Adam King vs Paul Gontarz / Shawn Khosla4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJoseph Hunter / Tim Weber vs John Henderson / Phillip Locklear6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBerett Hollis / Matthew Reynolds vs Bradley Martin / Adam Schere6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-09vs HOA/Mekles/18&Over4.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesTim Weber / Jacob Beck vs Nico Sigloch / Phillip Locklear3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Matthew Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Adam King
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Brian Dougherty
published 4.5
Jack Weiner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Reid Rosen
published
4.24
Berett Hollis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Michael Merchant
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.15
Jacob Beck
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.12
Nick McFee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.07
Kevin Arnhold
published
3.77
Anthony Seim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Jeffrey Bregovy
published
Joseph Hunter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Weber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Hunter + Tim Weber3453% games+5.7% vs expected
Michael Merchant + Adam King8455% games+5.5% vs expected
Matthew Reynolds + Reid Rosen3451% games+3.4% vs expected
Kevin Arnhold + Reid Rosen5254% games−0.3% vs expected
Jeffrey Bregovy + Tim Weber3249% gamesnot enough data
Jack Weiner + Jacob Beck404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Reynolds
62W–22L career · 1 line in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Adam King
17W–7L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Brian Dougherty
1W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Jack Weiner
15W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Reid Rosen
34W–15L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Berett Hollis
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Michael Merchant
51W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Jacob Beck
62W–46L career · 5 lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
4.15
Nick McFee
17W–18L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
Kevin Arnhold
27W–25L career · no lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Anthony Seim
63W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Jeffrey Bregovy
28W–30L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Hunter
48W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Tim Weber
51W–46L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.