Teams

Sengvilay/Nashville

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Mixed - Sunday

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-20vs Long/NashvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gilkey / Connor McPherson vs Kurt Guske / Lisa Rota0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSamuel Herlihy / Shaunielle Glen vs Taylor Duncan / Raymond Clark6-2, 6-3
2025-06-15vs Long/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesKatelyn Thorne / Rhett Brandt vs Jalil Bowler / Betsy Johnston6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShaunielle Glen / Kunal Marwah vs Jeff Gulko / Maggie Swett6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichelle Young / Eric Hess vs Kurt Guske / Taylor Duncan6-2, 7-5
2025-06-01vs Vandever/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Gilkey / Scott Patterson vs Jesse Harrison / Hannah Harrison6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEric Hess / Shaunielle Glen vs Sarah White / Joshua White5-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Young / Connor McPherson vs Kellie Sallis / Kenny Sallis6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed - Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Kunal Marwah
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Katelyn Thorne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Jennifer Gilkey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Becky Sengvilay
published 3
2.90
Brooke Scanlon
published 3
2.83
Shaunielle Glen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Connor McPherson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Rhett Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Hess
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Samuel Herlihy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kunal Marwah + Becky Sengvilay303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kunal Marwah
14W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Katelyn Thorne
17W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Jennifer Gilkey
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Becky Sengvilay
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Brooke Scanlon
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Shaunielle Glen
7W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Connor McPherson
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhett Brandt
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Eric Hess
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Samuel Herlihy
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.