Teams

Backhand compliments

Fall Adult 18 & Over WeekDAY (Non-Adv) · Ladies 2.5

7 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-24vs Net NinjasLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulisa Mandeville / Efrat Rosenberg vs Trisha Atwater / Laura Sykes3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSezer Isuf vs Natalie Hiddemen5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesInbal Kleinerman / Heilla Lain vs Amber Sue Huff / Sarah Scott6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-10-17vs Doubles TherapyWon 20
W#1 DoublesMartha Coerver / Jacquelyn Einaugler vs Niamh McMahon / Kelly Jo Specter6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesInbal Kleinerman vs Raquel Gorny6-4, 6-1
2025-10-10vs TerminettersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEvonne Gottsch / Jacquelyn Einaugler vs Amy Blahnik / Jessica Kessinger6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesSezer Isuf vs Bridget Alan1-6, 1-6
2025-10-03vs Tennis RocksWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartha Coerver / Jacquelyn Einaugler vs Shelly Alexander / Kate Polce6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-09-26vs ATX AcesLost 12
L#1 DoublesMartha Coerver / Efrat Rosenberg vs Kathleen Broughton / Jyoti MacHen5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJacquelyn Einaugler vs Tara Taraba6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeilla Lain / Inbal Kleinerman vs Claire O'Neal / Leslie Moore2-6, 4-6
2025-09-19vs Racq PacqWon 20
W#1 DoublesSezer Isuf / Efrat Rosenberg vs Kristin Parr / Brianna Thrash6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesInbal Kleinerman vs Katie Price6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Ladies 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tennis Rocks6114717163
2Backhand compliments2591228208
3The Bagel Girls1661531205

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.61
Jacquelyn Einaugler
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.32
Martha Coerver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Inbal Kleinerman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.30
Sezer Isuf
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Eileen Steinberger
published
2.24
Efrat Rosenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.04
Heilla Lain
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inbal Kleinerman + Sezer Isuf314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacquelyn Einaugler
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
Martha Coerver
12W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Inbal Kleinerman
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Sezer Isuf
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Eileen Steinberger
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.26
Efrat Rosenberg
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Heilla Lain
6W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.