Teams

En Fun

2021 DC Adult 55 & Over · WTA Adult 55 & Over Women 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / WASHINGTON D.C.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMelinda Shayuth / Philomena Morsell vs Cara Fulton / Carol Olaughlin2-6, 0-6
2021-06-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrea Foster / Suzanne Krudys vs Michie Dinger / Mary Olson4-6, 2-6
2021-06-07vs Anderson & AndersonLost 02
L#1 DoublesGail Bland / Melinda Shayuth vs Cara Fulton / Sylvia Okala1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Foster / Suzanne Krudys vs Annmarie Taggio / Rosalie Hooper1-6, 3-6
2021-05-25vs Anderson & AndersonLost 01
L#3 DoublesPatricia Brown / Rebecca Kehoe vs Grace Gourdine / Kay Bransford2-6, 3-6
2021-05-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesAndrea Foster / Suzanne Krudys vs Randy Rabinowitz / Jackie Dolan6-1, 6-3
2021-05-11vs ChenLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Kehoe / Patricia Brown vs Veronique Kessler / Sandy Horowitz1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WTA Adult 55 & Over Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Suzanne Krudys
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Jackie Livesay
published 3.5
3.19
De'Ana Dow
published 3.5
3.08
Rebecca Kehoe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.79
Desiree Crawford
published 3
2.78
Andrea Foster
published 3
2.77
Melinda Shayuth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Rona Birnbaum
published
Karen Holmes
published
Marjorie Goldman
published
Sandy Snyder
published
Ursulla McLeod
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Shayuth + Ursulla McLeod4155% gamesnot enough data
Suzanne Krudys + Sandy Snyder123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Suzanne Krudys
152W–110L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Jackie Livesay
13W–17L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.22
3.5
De'Ana Dow
3W–6L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Rebecca Kehoe
73W–68L career · 2 lines in 2021
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Desiree Crawford
5W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Andrea Foster
28W–29L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Melinda Shayuth
67W–88L career · 2 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Rona Birnbaum
6W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
Karen Holmes
4W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Marjorie Goldman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandy Snyder
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ursulla McLeod
11W–12L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.