Teams

DH-Thompson

2026 Mixed 40 & Over-GC · 4.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-19vs TOCC Render-Leach 40sWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Thompson / Kathleen Marlowe vs Drew Adams / Kelly Lucas6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSheldon Zhang / Mary Ann Strickland vs Bill Descher / Andrea May2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesColin Jones / Nicole Montagnet vs Charles Wilson / Kimberly Adams6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2026-07-16vs Biloxi - FoleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesSheldon Zhang / Mary Kay Walk vs Jeff LeBlanc / Lynette Cooper1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJoseph Gregory / Jennifer Hailes vs James Stinson / Cathy Saunier6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPhil Schmidt / Mary Ann Strickland vs Kevin Martin / Michelle Foley6-0, 6-4
2026-07-14vs TOCC Render-Leach 40sWon 21
W#1 DoublesSheldon Zhang / Jennifer Hailes vs Bill Descher / Heidi St. Amant6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPhil Schmidt / Laurraine McKenzie vs Drew Adams / Cynthia Render-Leach6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoseph Gregory / Mary Ann Strickland vs Adam Mcdowell / Andrea May4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-07-10vs Biloxi - FoleyLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hailes / Sheldon Zhang vs Danna Day / Jeff LeBlanc2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNicole Montagnet / Colin Jones vs Bryan Hall / Julie West6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Thompson / Laurraine McKenzie vs Wade Hardy / Dianne Holloway1-6, 1-6
2026-06-01vs BBTC - JuraszekLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoseph Gregory / Mary Ann Strickland vs Ryan Canon / Amanda Letonoff1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSheldon Zhang / Mary Kay Walk vs Johnny Hisaw / Shelly Williams6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesShannon Hailes / Jennifer Hailes vs Renaldo Jordan / Frances Vance7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Sheldon Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.84
Kathleen Marlowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.81
Colin Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Nicole Montagnet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Mary Ann Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Jennifer Hailes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Laurraine McKenzie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.52
Shannon Hailes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Mary Kay Walk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Phil Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.22
Pamela Giveans
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Hailes + Sheldon Zhang4251% games+2.1% vs expected
Jennifer Hailes + Shannon Hailes0640% games−4.2% vs expected
Kathleen Marlowe + Colin Jones3255% gamesnot enough data
Mary Kay Walk + Sheldon Zhang3249% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheldon Zhang
38W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
Kathleen Marlowe
46W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Colin Jones
17W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Nicole Montagnet
52W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.79
Mary Ann Strickland
26W–25L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.73
Jennifer Hailes
42W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Laurraine McKenzie
28W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.62
Shannon Hailes
6W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Mary Kay Walk
19W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
Phil Schmidt
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
3.49
Pamela Giveans
8W–11L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.