Teams

Korolkoff

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-14vs Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Rachel Bloch vs Banu Karimi-Shah / Gina Faricy2-6, 3-6
2023-12-07vs BarronWon 10
W#2 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Joanne Rome vs Robin Barron / Corinne Boisi6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-29vs Moco Match MakersLost 01
L#2 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Katie Clark vs Anne Pyne / Pamela Hjelle0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-11-15vs Callahan/koeleLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Rachel Bloch vs Mary Jo Roberton / Christine Pagendarm3-6, 4-6
2023-11-13vs MagginLost 01
L#1 DoublesSiobhan Abell / Jeanne Wolfe vs Nancy Eisner / Dawn Yules5-7, 1-6
2023-11-09vs WesleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesSiobhan Abell / Katie Clark vs Erin Kaplan / Brenda Clark6-2, 7-6
2023-10-31vs Point BreakersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Laura McIntosh vs Penelope Bell / Marie Sokoloff7-6, 5-3
2023-10-27vs Smart AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesSiobhan Abell / Rachel Bloch vs Holly Radus / Robin Birchfield6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGillian Moorhead / Jayne Korolkoff vs Erin Malawer / Christy Hinckley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Siobhan Abell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Dawn Forsberg
published 4
3.78
Rachel Bloch
published
3.75
Rebecca Nichols
published
Danielle Woo
published 4
3.69
Mary Papadopulos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Samantha Corrigan
published
3.32
Gillian Moorhead
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Julia Latein-Kimmig
published
3.11
Joanne Rome
published
3.08
Jayne Korolkoff
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Papadopulos + Siobhan Abell9263% games+3.4% vs expected
Jayne Korolkoff + Joanne Rome123 matchesnot enough data
Joanne Rome + Samantha Corrigan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Siobhan Abell
52W–17L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
4.07
4
Dawn Forsberg
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
Rachel Bloch
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
Rebecca Nichols
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Danielle Woo
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Mary Papadopulos
178W–103L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
Samantha Corrigan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Gillian Moorhead
168W–147L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
Julia Latein-Kimmig
14W–19L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Joanne Rome
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
Jayne Korolkoff
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.