Teams

Riley

2026 TriLevel 18&over-NE · Men 2.5, 3.0, 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 2.92 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
John Gatlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Tyler Richardson
published
2.85
Andy Burleson
published 3
Cody Carson
published 3
Josh Sullivan
published 3
2.73
Takashi Bob
published
2.58
Kazuki Sato
published
2.45
Ben Galjour
published 3
2.45
Mike Reynolds
published
2.39
Cagen Garriga
published 3
2.38
Michael Gann
published
2.32
Dylan Quinn
published
2.26
Josh Riley
published
2.02
Cole McCarty
published 2.5
Shane Turner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dylan Quinn + Cagen Garriga033 matchesnot enough data
Dylan Quinn + Mike Reynolds213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Gann + Tyler Richardson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Gatlin
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Tyler Richardson
6W–0L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.94
3
Andy Burleson
19W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Cody Carson
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Josh Sullivan
no matches on record · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Takashi Bob
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Kazuki Sato
13W–16L career · no lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
3
Ben Galjour
8W–26L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.45
Mike Reynolds
13W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
3
Cagen Garriga
19W–16L career · no lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
Michael Gann
9W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.38
Dylan Quinn
4W–16L career · no lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Josh Riley
5W–29L career · no lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.26
2.5
Cole McCarty
1W–12L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Shane Turner
0W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.